If I'm not mistaken, this is one of the core tenets of the EU AI act.
admin
joined 1 year ago
If that's what gets you going :s
That's GPT talking to DALL-E though - GPT is just the messenger, and has no idea what's in the image, other than the prompt it generated for you.
I take back my previous comment. Where do I sign?
While there are several ways to approach direct brain communication, they all have their benefits and drawbacks. Indirect methods, like this one, are much safer. But direct implantations, while riskier to get going, have the potential for near unlimited speed (both in bandwidth as well as reaction time).
The latter definitely will have more benefits in the long run.
Does that mean I'd want one in my head right now? Absolutely not. But if I were a unable to control most of my appendages, I'd definitely consider it.
I don't know what that means.
"Dank u. Voor het winkelen. Bij jumbo." 🔇
the Taylor Swift porn deepfakes were Dall-e.
Got a source for that? I only have experience with DALL-E 3, but that is really picky about nudity, copyright and portrait right.
So was Google in its first decade or so. Hell, I'll even grant that AWS, GCP and k8s have been mostly benevolent. But these parties becoming near monopolies for hosting or routing is costing a price of centralization.
Huh? GDPR is about your rights to your personal data, not the algorithms that act upon them. And the EU AI act has not been put into law yet, AFAIK.