aidan

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

equatable

But they aren't equivalent. You're now saying they're equivalent.

Now I know you’re trolling.

I'm not.

But that’s better than someone who genuinely does think child rape is fine, so that’s good.

I agree, good thing I don't think that.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You just said I compared not equated...

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I analogized, but I'm glad you finally admit I didn't equate them. Because, shockingly, comparing is not equating. Literally any 2 things can be compared, that isn't equating.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I didn't, quote where I did, you're trolling for no reason to just not admit to being wrong

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I didn't and you know I didn't that's why you're not quoting it

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

No you didn't because I didn't, quote it

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

If I equated them it should easy to quote where I did, that's the last I'll say on the matter until you quote it.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you believe he suddenly changed his mind on an opinion he held and shouted to the world, 2 days after it became apparent he might lose his job over it?

Why didn't he reverse then? He's never seemed shy about sharing his opinions before.

If someone committed fraud, then went to court and said “your honour, I actually agree with you. Fraud is wrong. I came to that conclusion this morning.” would you believe them?

An opinion however gross isn't a crime.

It’s what all of your comments have been about. Don’t play dumb.

I never said it, that's why you can't quote it

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

No, he thinks raping children is a good thing.

Again, he never said that.

Saying “thought” implies he no longer does.

He claims he no longer does, can you read his mind?

Yes you are.

Quote what exactly I said that was either of those things.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

Quote where I said they're the same thing.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I posted it because of the crypto connection, also posted it in c/news

view more: next ›