albert180

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

No, not every company can afford to Bulldoze the competition in the Browser Market because they have indefinite deep pockets from the Ad Business.

If that unfair advantage goes away there will be more competition again in the Browser Segment .

Also Marketshare can grow and shrink quick

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Google can Set Standards to their own Advantage, e.g. with regards to Tracking which reinforces their Monopoly on Things Like Ads, the Same reason they crippled all the AdBlockers with ManifestV3 on Chromium-based Browsers

And the only alternative that isn't Chromium-based is Firefox. (Or Safari with WebKit). All other Browsers use Chromium

So it would be really good for everyone if they were forced to sell Chrome

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's possible, but Not necessary. The Plugin includes a client

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But they include it, as I've written it 🙄

(They pool multiple shadow libraries)

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

BiglyBT includes an embedded I2P-Client

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

There are already Torrents with the raw data and they've used IPFS in the past, but decided it was not ready https://annas-archive.org/torrents (They pool multiple shadow libraries)

view more: ‹ prev next ›