anothermember

joined 1 year ago
[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

Just Thunderbird is fine for me, has all the features I want and I already get my email there (but even if I didn't I'd struggle to find an RSS reader with its features).

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

OpenSUSE, it's what I'd be using if Fedora didn't exist.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It was Red Hat Linux 8.0 (not to be confused with RHEL 8), I think, that I first dabbled in Linux, that was around early 2003, and then I moved on to Fedora Core 1. But I went exclusively-Linux with Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper Drake) in 2006.

I've moved around since then but for the last 5 years I've ended up back on Fedora, where I've been since version 28, now version 39.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 12 points 10 months ago

4.20 still feels like yesterday

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It just adds another layer of abstraction when my file manager works just fine. I think it started back in the iPod days, and now you have a generation of people who don't know how to manage files.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

VLC because it works with everything and it doesn't try to organise my music collection for me.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

That didn't exist when I tried TW, but that's something I'll at least try out on a second machine at some point.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

One that might be controversial: OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. I still have a lot of respect for this distro and I really wanted to like it but it's just not for me. It's the fact that major updates could occur any day of the week, which could be time-consuming to install or they could change the features of the OS. It always presented a dilemma of whether to hold back updates which might include holding back critical updates.

So rolling distros aren't for me, everyone expects to run in to some occasional issues with Arch, but TW puts a lot of emphasis on testing and reliability, so I thought it might be for me. But the reality is I much prefer the release cycle and philosophy of Fedora, I think that strikes the best balance.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's the best Chromium browser, but unfortunately still a Chromium browser. Pleased to see it in Flathub though.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I suppose it depends on how much stuff you have, doing a full back up of my home every week is too time consuming to be practical but takes a couple of minutes with this method.

Keeping multiple past snapshots is overkill for me but I do it because I can, more-or-less. It would be useful if I accidentally delete a file and only remember it months later.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The real power for btrfs for me is incremental backups; you can take a snapshot of your home partition and send it to a backup device, then you can take a second snapshot a week later and just send the differences between them. I do my weekly backups like this. You can keep many multiple snapshots to roll back if needs be since only the differences between snapshots take up space. This is the tutorial that got me started.

view more: next ›