artwork

To be frank, I don't know any case when Valve forced these rules, and even when someone reported such cases to Steam support directly. The response was just - "Thank you. We will check it out.", and that's it.

Self-published developers I am aware of have been considering these "rules" as fair suggestion from Valve who point out that it's important to Valve stay afloat in competition, where many developers will just follow these getting the point, which is straightforward.

A few developers I know do find following this "rule" a respect towards the platform in general even.

Thank you! I believe both titles are abs((float)$incredible)/INF... The story, characters, references, technical features, or every single bit and algorithm is perfect...

Not to mention upgraded kernels and shells, including drones and 'dgets!
Yet it all may not match the "good" you are searching for at this particular moment, or would it? How could we know!
Both titles were developed by different genius teams even, the former is Ubisoft Monreal, the latter - Ubisoft Toronto!
I.e. Even if MetaSploit and not Snyk's or PortSwigger's but FOSS is there... you may still find that the payload in all the exploits the solution provides you with, written by OSINT or more hopefully red... authors on the wires, is indeed a required parameter to be set upon execution/injection by you, the main host in the network! 🦋

How to not find Watch_Dogs 2 and Watch_Dogs Legion both very different and ineffably marvelous...
I uploaded a few screenshots found in some remote backups:
- Watch_Dogs 2: https://imgur.com/a/GZ7F88U;
- Watch_Dogs Legion: https://imgur.com/a/U07Yfch (Wrench is there, too, with Aiden!); 👻

Being bored and hateful is a choice. It all depends on what you are searching for, doesn't it ^^

That is so... meta! ~ Wrench ✨

Thank you!

If you want to actually realize the amount of possible misunderstanding in the current conversation and of what shell scriting is, please do consider joining #bash at Libera IRC. Please do also mention the word "throwaway" in the rooms! Since there's literally no understanding on what you mean still, sorry. It does not feel like you have a significant enough understanding of the subjects raised.

For a very simple example, there are literally no documentation regarding certain cases you'll encounter in Bash's built-ins even, unless you actually encounter it or learn from Bash's very source code, like read built-in. Not to mention shenanigans in shell logics for inter-process communication (IPC), file-descriptors, environment variables like PWD, exported functions' BASH_FUNC_, pipes, etc.

I still don't get what you mean, sorry. And why Bash and not another shell?
Why not another shell like Korn, Ash, Dash, Zsh, Fish, or anything REPL, including PHP, Perl, Node, Python etc.

Should we consider "throwaway" anything that supports interactive mode of your daily driver you chose in your default terminal prompt?
What does "throwaway" code means in the first place?

I am sorry, but I am not sure what tells you how Bash "was designed" or not. Perhaps you haven't yet written anything serious in Bash...
Have you checked out Bash PitFalls at Wooledge, at least?
Bash, or the most shells, including Posix, or even Perl, are some of the most complex languages out there to make a mistake... since there's no compiler to protect you from, and though legendary but readline may cause the whole terminal go flying, depending on the terminal/terminfo in process...

No, sorry. I absolutely disagree on your stance regarding "shell" for a "bugless" "huge deal" in "real cases".

It's rather sad when such extensions don't refer to their source code in descriptions.
Meanwhile, Google Chrome extensions are to be updated automatically.
Sorry, I won't install it, since I have no trust in the source of it, and I care about my time to not re-check it on every update.

No, thank you. Sorry, never.

Not only that, but the huge probability of mistakes is just deafening. The last time I used LLM was in 2023 someone recommended for a task at paper work, and I got a literal headache in 10 minutes... Since then I never ever will use that sorrow for anything that is not for blackbox pentesting or experimental unverified data generated you may find in medicine or military isolated solutions.

That deafening feel that every single bit of output from that LLM or void machine may contain a mistake no soul is accountable for to ask about... A generated bit of someone's work you just cannot verify since no source nor human is available... How would you trace the rationale that resulted in the output shown?

Faster? Is that so... Doesn't verification of every output require even more time to test it and consider stable, to prove it is correct, to stay accountable for the knowledge and actions you perform as a developer, artist, researcher... human?

Your mind is to be trained to do a research, remember, and do not depend on someone's service to a level of predominance/replacement.
Meanwhile, effort, passion, creativity, empathy, and love, in turn, you carry, supports in long-term.

You may not care now, though, but you do you. It's your mind and memory you develop.