artyom

joined 1 month ago
[–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 4 days ago

I know what rule 34 is, I'm asking where this image came from

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

It doesn't dismiss anything. It's just a statement of fact. Certainly in certain contexts it could be interpreted that way.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

What's Rule34?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Whether you know it or not does not change the message. Abusive couples shouldn't not use this app, they shouldn't be couples.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago (6 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to

They can't. Not using any known technology. Even basic encryption like AES256 would take 10^50 years on a supercomputer. That's not even getting into quantum-resistant encryption.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Which has nothing to do with encryption?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I mean to my knowledge the US hasn't tried to force encryption backdoors recently?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 27 points 5 days ago

They don't care. It's not their information and there are no consequences.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We have heard this non-sense before, only to find it's trivially easy to connect to your PID.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›