artyom

joined 1 month ago
[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to

They can't. Not using any known technology. Even basic encryption like AES256 would take 10^50 years on a supercomputer. That's not even getting into quantum-resistant encryption.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Which has nothing to do with encryption?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I mean to my knowledge the US hasn't tried to force encryption backdoors recently?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago

They don't care. It's not their information and there are no consequences.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have heard this non-sense before, only to find it's trivially easy to connect to your PID.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago
[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How is that a "fingerprint"?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The region that repeatedly insists on backdoors in any encrypted communications?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If your partner doesn't abuse it is fine, but that's also possible to change at any time.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 42 points 1 week ago (12 children)

they're more privacy-preserving than visual images.

hhhhwat. How can they identify you and also be privacy preserving? 🤔

view more: ‹ prev next ›