baggins

joined 1 year ago
[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'd 100% pay for it if the pricing made any sense.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eleventeen eleventy leven

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How do you know anything about anything an LLM generates? Presumably if you're the author you would recognize your own work?

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

By comparing it to the original work.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

You commented that it's "super weird and invasive" for an ISP to "firewall" listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.

I think I'm good 👍

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from "opening ports"?

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago (6 children)

They're probably just using CGNAT.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Ass-wipe skip is definitely a viable time-save.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

If skipping is blocked in the ad, the client must know it's playing an ad somehow?

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 months ago

The server must have to send some metadata to the client telling when it's running an ad because there are other things that need to happen client side during that like adjusting of the time or making the ad clickable

view more: ‹ prev next ›