bane_killgrind

🙄 this is interesting? Is there no new application or topology here?

If it's just "more power vroom" this is only valuable for entertainment.

It's more like "idiot billionaire builds bigger shiny gadget for a non specific purpose"

Like what's the problem being solved here?

All I know is, if I show up at somebody's house and tell them "this is your child" when I only have part of their child, they would not agree with me.

Yeah

Your superceded constitution... That doesn't exist any more.

You don't understand that the Constitution is made up of all the amendments to it or you don't understand that cherry picking the amendments you want to read is stupid?

I like that double entendre good job

When we said give the people what they want, we got this, and we do.

you don’t talk about salary within earshot of the boss, you don’t badmouth company decisions within earshot of the boss

Or, do these things all the time if you can base your working hours around making your company more money.

Yeah same re: purchasing convenience vs pirating.

Pirating is a juicy prospect once again.

But your premise is bad

Prior to launch, we agreed to a comprehensive set of rules to govern image creation, including that people in images be fully clothed.

Apparently they thought about it, but neglected to think that some "vacation" images in the training data might not be tagged with the clothing worn or that the model might sometimes consider only pants to be fully clothed because some of the training data might show topless women in public and not be tagged. Or topless men.