In the US not all licenses are transferable, and that includes things like “accounts”.
That's maybe a service that you can't transfer but it's still holding property of the account holder. More like escrow.
As to lawyers, well, they aren't hiring lawyers to follow the intent of the law but to write terms that they think they might get away with, at least for a while, and if not, not be nailed for fraud or such. Corporate lawyers are just as slimy in the EU as they are elsewhere.
on the other hand I’m wondering about dessalines’ nationality
I'm guessing US, on account of the whole "America Bad" thing. Can also be seen with European tankies but they're not nearly as much USSR stans and way more likely to identify as Trots. South American is another option but then I'd expect at least some of his output to be Spanish/Portuguese. It all does have that US exceptionalism turned around "The US is the source of all evil, ever" kind of vibe you generally only see from Americans as the rest of the world plain and simply isn't seeped in US jingoism and self-importance.
...also I didn't really invest much time in this at all, if someone else did, please enlighten us.
s/about /bull/
With a physical good you’re transferring ownership of that “thing”,
A use-right is also a thing that can be sold and for which stuff like the first sale doctrine applies. Possession and property of the use right is all yours, even if it does not include the right to make additional copies, that is, to sublicense.
At least that's how it works over here, always has. You can get perfectly valid Windows Pro keys here on the cheap, there's a small cottage industry buying up volume licenses at bankruptcy proceedings and the like and unbundling them. If Microsoft can't stop that then Valve won't, either.
They'll be forced to accept it, at least in the EU, they will also need to enable you to resell your games. EU law on this is clear, rulings in other cases are clear, all we're waiting for is for Valve to stop appealing or lose before the ECJ, whatever is first.
The tl;dr is if they want to argue that they're simply renting out licenses then they shouldn't be taking one-time but regular payments, or only give out time-limited licenses for one-time payments, or some such. They should also avoid terms such as "buy" and "summer sale" like the plague.
Unsuuuure if Linux is compatible with the graphic/music production software I’m working with, or if there are viable work arounds.
I have no idea about music production but ardour is linux-native and the technical backend stuff is definitely there (you'll want to use jack in real-time mode to hook everything up and together). Graphics-wise if you can do what you want to do with blender and/or krita you're also set. You'll be able to sync up blender and ardour via jack. Dunno about video editing blender has always been sufficient for me and I already know it. There's also plenty of more coding-oriented music stuff, have some live-coded music.
He's a judge by profession, btw. Any law weasel's worst nightmare.
I contacted our local Pirate party about the topic, because they don’t have anything related to crime prevention vs. privacy in their programe.
The general attitude in the German PP back in the days when I kept track (it's been a while) was "stop slurping data you'll never need from people not even under investigation, hire more investigators and do actual police work instead".
A good example here is the arrest of the founder of silk road: No computers were hacked in the process. They put a team of investigators on it who found OPSEC failures which are kinda unavoidable when you're up against a state-level actor. All without mass surveillance, only thing needed was good ole police work.
Also, side note, "prevention" and "enforcement" should never be used in the same sentence. The best crime prevention is social policy, not law enforcement. Next in line, swift and fair sentences in juvenile courts, time is very crucial there to form an association in still malleable minds. Next in line, sentences that forego retribution and focus on reintegration.
I don't think those rankings themselves are the problem, at least not the ones mentioned in the article, the issue is a lack of transparency and configurability.
"isLocalCovidAuthority" makes a hell a lot of sense but if it gets boosted to the front then google should say "We are prioritising this result because we deem it trustworthy source of relevant information": If you make an editorial decision, actually stand by it.
"isSmallPersonalSite" also makes sense, but what about giving users the choice of prioritising or deprioritising it instead of making it for them?
The trough of disillusionment is definitely already there in academia but the market forces that be override that with massive amounts of hype, silicon, and YOLO. Billionaire capital and attitude can provide that, it can't provide basic research, because velocity is valued way higher than going anywhere sensible.
They also didn't mean lynx and yet I mentioned it. How come? Might the distinct possibility exist that I used the opportunity to draw a wider picture, and "you mean X" has to be understood as internet brain-rot rhetorics, not literally?
Just a suggestion.
I'd like to note for the record that I downvoted you not for using the term "racist", that definitely seems to be an accurate assessment, but for saying "European". For one, a European racist wouldn't care about Canada, for two, Indians aren't really a large or noticeable or denigrated immigrant group anywhere in Europe but maybe the UK, and for three, UK racists wouldn't care about "the continent".
No, what we're looking at here seems to be a Canadian racist. They can keep them.