"We didn't do it, and if we did it was fair use, and if it wasn't progress will be hampered if rules and regulations are too strict."
bartolomeo
Lmao notifications have no context for me (I just see the reply) but I knew right away exactly what comment this was about
What's up with this guy?
Imagine using such an insane amount of resources on just yourself.
I'm exposed to some very wealthy people at work and none of them are normal. I feel like money is a drug and greed is addiction and these people are so mentally fargone (in that they can only see the world that's described by money and think of every human interaction as a transaction or investment) that they are like children who design their own meal plan
Breakfast: bowl of nerds Lunch: 14 kit kats Dinner: marshmallows
and then wonder why their feelings have gone haywire and they can't get no satisfaction.
I've noticed a lot of commenters straight away take things personally and think that mentioning something is endorsing it. That kills discussion and turns it into a defensive symantic battle against commenters' assumptions.
Thats because they exported their economic problems to the colonies. Look up how many people starved to death In British colonial India.
Those were economic policies that had brutal real world effects, and the Opium Wars were absolutely shameful, especially because the British did it twice. Do non-capitalist systems also have any sort of incentive for colonialism and all the nasties that come with it, like slavery?
Great thank you for the info and links.
I appreciate all the links you're posting in this thread, I'm learning a lot.
No socialist State has ever been won at the ballot box
Which are the socialist states in existence right now? Are European countries socialist? Nordics? I know these classifications are subjective but I would love to hear what you and others think.
How are redistribution and workers owning production centralization? I mean from a "libertarian perspective".
Ooooh I see what you mean, thanks.
communities are big enough to usually snuff it out
That's awesome, power to the people!
Those too poor to afford to pay don't deserve to have access to it anyway, right?
Those too poor to afford to pay get it for free, comrade.
I feel like a lot of people are wholly unaware of FOSS. But anyway my free market idea would require consent, for example a pop-up that says "would you like to pay $0.30 or watch an 8 second ad to view the content?" and then people could make their choice. If their choice is neither then they will go somewhere else for the information or entertainment. Consent is absent from the current model, aside from using an ad blocker to signal your refusal.
There are tons of videos (educational and otherwise) on youtube that have never paid out to their creators, either because they were from the era before youtube enshittified or because the algorithm decided that the content creator has earned nothing. It reminds me of the old argument that "you shouldn't pirate music because it's not fair to the artist" but man you've got to see those record contracts, especially those made to black or otherwise underprivileged artists. Being fair to the artist was never an imperative, but this argument still persists with people who identify themselves with their jailers, or who actually don't really care that much (not saying that in a bad way).
Humans by nature are creative and helpful. We will always make how-to videos, guides, music, stories, and art. We don't need megacorps to facilitate this, it's the megacorps that want in, and they're going to have to come up with a better business model.
I only have the OS on the sd card and I pop that out and
dd
a copy to my backup drive every 6 months or so. For that reason I like to use small sd cards like 8gb size. All other drives on the machine are external or network drives and those have their own backup routine withrsync
.Do you use only the sd card or what kind of storage system do you have on your sbc?