sounds like it's time to allow third-party clients distribute the server software, shut down free "servers" and offer paid hosting and support. that would cut costs a great deal.
bigMouthCommie
joined 4 years ago
>But with others already able to exploit that, why would Proton want to do that?
to comply with a warrant
use the service, and tell them to use it. just like how they made you use discord. and you can whine every time they refuse.
they could ship malicious js to their frontend that would give them access to the unencrypted session. you are going on faith every time you load the interface.
I don't trust them because they don't use established security practices and their interfaces abstract away the internals and they have complied with law enforcement and admitted they could compromise contents(not just metadata) and they don't accept anonymous payment.
they didn't say threads is transphobic. tehy said threads allows transphobic content
do you trust the person who signed it? if not, dont fucking trust it.
what more needs to be done?
what's wrong with simple cryptographic signatures?
why do I need a block chain?
this is exactly why section 230 exists. sites aren't responsible for what other people post and they are allowed to moderate however they want.
view more: next ›
there are web clients for mumble