brickfrog

joined 2 years ago
[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

LibreTorrent is the standard if you're looking for an open source client that works well. You can install from the Google Play Store but from what I've read it works better if you install it from elsewhere / sideload the .apk so it can better access the Android storage.

BiglyBT is also open source and available on Android (never used it myself).

There's also FrostWire, it is open source though it tries to do a bit more than just torrents so it's not always quite what people are looking for. I remember the main dev used to be active over on Reddit not sure if he ever made it over to the Lemmyverse.

A lot of people do like Flud, not open source or anything like that but it does have its fans.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 months ago

Strange, are people really arguing that? Back in 2020 Alexis Ohanian resigned from the board of Reddit and asked for his seat to be replaced with a black candidate. Say what you want about the guy but he doesn't seem that out of touch with America's racial issues.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/05/tech/alexis-ohanian-reddit/index.html

I don't have any issues with the guy but IMO the Digg thing may end up going nowhere if they're really planning on relying on AI for moderation, just seems like like a bad idea overall

https://www.theverge.com/social/624073/digg-relaunch-2025

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The paid way to do this is is to buy something like Streamfab to download the stream directly from the source. Note for the most part you will be limited to 720p/1080p. Another paid software that used to be around was Redfox AnyStream but they went offline last year.

Only private trackers / scene would know about 2160p / 4K downloads and they're not going to share publicly about their methods.

The free method is to attempt to do the video capture yourself (see earlier comments) rather than download the stream itself.

Of course for the most part tons of content has already been downloaded by others and made available via torrents, DDL, etc.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Seems like more plebbit spam.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 months ago

Lots of permaseeders out there, you can be one too :)

There's no real downside as long as your ISP doesn't limit your bandwidth.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’m getting the “moov atom not found” error even though the file is at 100%. The whole torrent isn’t at 100% yet, but I enabled sequential downloading.

Either the .mp4 is corrupt, or you need to wait for the torrent itself to finish 100% complete.

You are downloading in sequential mode, and it sounds like these .mp4 files were generated with the moov atom at the end of the file. Which means the file is cut off at the very end (aka corrupt) or the torrent itself just never finished downloading the last pieces of that .mp4 file.

At least that's how I'm understanding your question... you're saying the file is at 100% but you're also saying the torrent isn't at 100%, to me that sounds like there's torrent pieces missing to complete the rest of the .mp4 file maybe.

EDIT: Just to add, technically encoding software can write that moov atom at the beginning of the .mp4 file which would avoid this problem entirely but it sounds like these files you're downloading aren't encoded that way. In encoding software usually that means "optimizing" the file or making it "web" ready for a web browser to play immediately as it downloads sequentially.. I forget what ffmpeg calls it specifically.

EDIT 2: Thinking about it, if you're desperate to play this file as-is maybe you can run it through ffmpeg to create a new .mp4 file and then play it that way. It's not a real fix since the original source seems to be broken but you may be able to get something playable at least.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Again with this? You're just spamming /c/Piracy at this point (and probably breaking rule #4).

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Torrent swarms need at least one connectable (port forwarded) peer for any torrent data to transfer. In large torrent swarms you won't notice this too much since there are usually plenty of connectable peers available.

The effect tends to be more noticeable in smaller swarms.

In practice you may not notice unless you try to download those torrents with one lone seed who also happen to have no port forward. In those cases you'll see there's a seed but no torrent data ever transfers over to you. (note that the same happens in reverse if you're the lone seed on many torrents)

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Are there new ones that carry the torch? Do the successors to these release groups have their trackers too?

The vast majority of public torrent indexers do not run their own trackers.

Dead trackers are common with old torrents. Personally I remove all the public trackers and just let DHT take care of that.

But if you prefer to have active public trackers on there then you could

  1. Remove all the dead ones
  2. Add the top x trackers from https://github.com/ngosang/trackerslist
[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Something like https://github.com/fedarovich/qbittorrent-cli ? Haven't used it myself but it's been on my radar.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

I’ve found REDacted and Orpheus quite appealing, but they’re “hard” to get into

You just have to interview for either/both of them, they're not really that hard to get into. Certainly easier to get into vs any of the big movie/tv trackers, none of those have interview to join.

That said if you are already established at other big private trackers then often you may be able to just join via the tracker's internal forums, tracker recruiters are often found there.

Discussed in the earlier post https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/35846542

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Ah that's interesting, all the banks around me stopped issuing ATM cards and only issue debit cards nowadays. I wish I wasn't required to have a debit card with those banks - I purposely tell my banks to disable debit/POS features on the debit card so it is only functional at ATMs.

All that aside you should consider getting a credit card or a prepaid credit card for those types of transactions. It's safer to separate your bank account from your day-to-day payments/shopping, not great when someone gets access to your debit card which then gives them direct access to your bank account balance. At least with a credit card those situations are just a dispute that never affect your actual money in the bank.

view more: ‹ prev next ›