J'avoue que même si j'avais un gros doute sur l'excuse de la tradition rurale , 30% de cadres et seulement 4% d'agriculteurs je m'y attendais pas.
Et c'est rafraîchissant aussi d'avoir le point de vue des ruraux qui sont les premiers emmerdés, et qui sont loin d'être tous derrière la toute petite minorité de chasseurs.
Not sure what's bothering everyone, it's clearly a very normal rat. It's even helpfully labelled "Rat" in case you're not sure.
Just a rat and its perfectly normal dck.
The solution would be easy, just stop having an LLM chatbot.
But I suspect they don't want to because someone sold them on how good and cheap and human-resource-free it was, and now they think they're too invested.
I've wanted a more recent take on the Movies for a while actually. I love the concept of it, the weird mix of management game and making your own ridiculous movie clips, but it has glitches and annoying limitations on modern hardware (not least of which, low resolution with no wide screen aspect ratio).
For those wondering like me, that's a bit over 60m in rest of the world units.
That's crazy.
Signé.
Les gens de l'ARCOM, ça vous ferait des vacances de plus avoir à gérer les signalements constants. Moi je dis ça je dis rien...
Je parie plus sur une bande de vieux cons qui ne supportent pas qu'on puisse regarder autre chose que leur gueule pour 10 minutes. On n'a pas une obligation légale de tenir compagnie à tous les individus qui passent.
Si c'était autre chose que du "de mon temps" d'abrutis, j'imagine qu'ils interdisent aussi de lire un livre/un journal? Ce qu'on peut aussi (et en grande majorité maintenant) faire sur des appareils électroniques? Non, seulement les écrans? Ah ben ça c'est curieux.
Interdit de scroller en marchant
Ouais, ok, c'est vrai que c'est pas prudent.
Interdit de scroller sur un banc, ou quand on est littéralement juste en train d'attendre, et même déconseillé d'utiliser un GPS
Ah ah, non. Qu'est-ce que c'est que cette dérive de dictature à la con. La liberté des uns s'arréte là où commence celle des autres, et là, on parle d'un comportement qui ne dérange absolument personne.
Fucking YouTube shorts.
Every content creator has to partake in the stupidity because it's that or becoming an algorithm outcast, so they awkwardly cut bits of their videos just to post a couple of those.
And then YouTube forces them in everyone's throat, with absolutely no regard for the medium and no option to filter them out.
No, YouTube, I won't watch your stupidly formatted 10-second bits of nothing on my TV.
There are lots of other games in that genre.
The Megami Tensei series, along with a lot of its spin-offs, is very far from Pokémon's style and themes, came before it, and clearly a (very dark) monster collection RPG.
One game that I only tried recently and that I wasn't even aware was in this genre is Ni no kuni. Its monster collecting aspect only really begins a few hours in, but when it comes into play it becomes a major element of the game. Very cute and charming RPG.
There's a Dragon Quest Monsters series, Yo-Kai Watch, and a lot of other ones I am aware of but didn't try. Pokémon doesn't really exist in a vacuum, it's just by far the most successful.
A (at most) 20 second parodic imitation in a short cartoon is no different from a whole hour-long stand-up special automatically generated using a life's worth of actual stand-up material?
It got published, people noticed it, people saw it was bullshit, it got retracted. Publishing is not the end of the line.
It's an extreme example, but it's still an example of the system working in the end. Reasonable people are supposed to question what they read, not blindly trust it, that's how you catch "important shit".
The problem is not that some bad papers get published. The problem would be them staying unchallenged. And it's also a problem that laymen consider one random study is an undeniable proof of their argument (potentially ignoring the thousands of studies contradicting it).