brsrklf

joined 1 year ago
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They've chosen series with huge amounts of existing content to imitate and got bad stuff from it. I am not too worried for people making more personal content.

Yeah, maybe some time in the future you'll get infinite serial AI content with basic entertainment value. I'd say half of Disney productions already got there without needing AI, just shotgun writing. And lots of people are already bored of it all and now only look for the good stuff.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 45 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Ok, I'm all for worrying about the impact of AI in jobs but... Living advertisements are easy to replace, what a suprise.

People who make actual interesting and/or funny videos, those that require personal work and are a direct result of the creator's skills or interests, are not really at risk of this.

Wow, a bunch of assholes just getting paid for showing you free stuff they got, pretending to be relatable and your friend while evading their taxes in Dubai, may be out of business. And think of those parents who won't be able to exploit their kids by getting them free toys and exposing them to the whole world!

I don't think I will lose any sleep over this.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Suis pas sûr que la plupart des gens qui crient au scandale aujourd'hui ait été fans des sorties de route navrantes de Depardieu il y a 30 ans. Soit ils devaient déjà trouver le personnage un peu puant, soit ils étaient trop jeunes pour se faire un avis (voire pas nés, hein, y a des adultes majeurs et vaccinés aujourd'hui dans ce cas).

Et j'ai envie de dire, même si dans le tas y a des quinquas ou plus qui ont sincèrement changé d'avis sur ce qui est acceptable, et alors? Tant mieux en fait.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There was a time when not revealing your identity was considered the safe way to be online, and telling strangers your name or personal info was taboo. Really, it was basic internet hygiene. The first push for real identities on social networks came mostly from advertisers, and those can go to hell.

Yes, some people abuse anonymity to be assholes with no repercussions, and obviously I am not okay with that. There should be ways to deal with those without forcing everyone to expose their identity to the whole world.

I will keep defending the right to anonymity. You only need one deranged maniac with different views on whatever, or trying to ruin your life for whatever reason to get into serious danger.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago

Je pense pas avoir jamais entendu "du coup" dans le sens soudainement, tout à coup. Pour moi il y a toujours une notion de conséquence.

D'un coup, oui, ça peut marcher pour soudainement, mais c'est pas la même expression.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

Wait, it's real? Baba is you x Into the Breach?

I didn't know I needed that.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Didn't know about that story, I just read that part. Surprise, it was Nacon again trying to shit all over their partners' contracts for a quick buck (see Frogwares).

I still remember them for providing the absolute worst console controllers and the cheapest kind of shovelware back in the 00s. Their transition to scummy publisher is not too surprising, I guess.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Apprend leur aussi que le chat masque automatiquement ton mot de passe si tu le rentres dessus.

Comme ça :

*******

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago

I don't disagree. Not much of a Randy player myself, but I see the point.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

C'est quoi l'expression équivalente à "manger l'oignon" en français? Pas facile de trouver un truc avec gorafi aussi...

view more: ‹ prev next ›