bunitor

joined 2 months ago
[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

gobolinux

it's main feature is that it completely redefines the system's root directory structure. the only reason i even know it exists is because i'm friends with one of the creators

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

that could be true, but my comment was the takeaway i had from reading the other comments in this thread (and from previous experience elsewhere on the internet). most people answering "arch" or "gentoo" are saying, themselves, that they like it because it "teaches them how linux works" or that they "like compiling stuff". clearly the focus is tinkering with the system as an end in of itself, not using the system as a means to another end

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The wallpaper has to be free of any themes related to sex, drugs, or violence.

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 4 days ago

Skeuomorphism is hard to get just right without being excessive and tacky

that was always my impression of os x back in the day. it felt tacky as hell. i'm a linux guy, but windows's aero was so much more beautiful

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 4 days ago

skeumorphism is fucking ugly and it's the main thing that made me dislike the appearance of os x back in the day. it honestly blew my mind people found apple to be the vanguard of graphical design

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 29 points 5 days ago (5 children)

from the comments, there's a split between

  • linux as a tool: debian, mint, fedora, opensuse, etc.
  • linux as a toy: arch, gentoo, nixos, etc.

i wish this split was made more explicit, because more often than not someone comes looking for recommendations for linux as a tool, but someone else responds expecting they want linux as a toy. then the person will try out linux and will leave because it's not what they want, not knowing that there is a kind of linux that is what they want

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i see people saying that, but the process was almost automatic to me. what issues are you having?

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

unix is about doing one thing and doing it well, which is why systemd, baaad

...what do you mean ditch x11 in favor of wayland? no no, we need to preserve x11, the famous one-thing-well-doer

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 6 days ago

did you understand my question?

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 6 days ago

enjoy having the best blacklisted drivers on linux then i guess

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 30 points 6 days ago (5 children)

that's disconnected me from the general linux user experience

are we romanticizing having a broken system?

 

i'm seriously considering permanently abandoning laptops in favor of tablets. i spent a day working on my wife's tablet today and it was fine enough for when you're on the go that the small screen isn't too much of an issue. plus, you get an extended battery life, no noise, more comfort carrying it around, and the best of all, for much less money

the biggest downside is that, since tablets are technically embedded devices, they're much more locked up and you basically have no access to the system with the stock rom

so im looking for a cheap tablet ($100-$200), around 10 inches, that i can easily (or at least reliably) install linux to. any recommendations?

 

(this post obviously assumes the recent removal of russian devs due to sanctions is bad; no need to comment if you disagree)

a lot of people i know are considering jumping ship to some bsd after the recent MAINTAINERS debacle, but i'm skeptical it would make any difference. afaik, they're just as us-centric as linux if not more (it's the berkeley software distribution, after all). also, my biggest gripe about the bsds and the main reason i've never had any interest in them is their permissive licensing. permissive licenses suck

would there be any difference wrt sanctions in the bsds or moving away from linux to *bsd bc of that would be pointless?

view more: next ›