canis_majoris

joined 1 year ago
[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You calling somebody out publicly is entirely to illicit a reaction from the crowd. Surely, a direct message would have been more appropriate for a disagreement over a series of downvotes?

By doing this publicly you've definitely made the situation way, way worse than it had to be.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I disagree with bringing in more redditors to this site. I think the community ambassador system is a quick way of creating a bunch of powermoderators on a system that's supposed to be designed to resist that kind of behavior and centralization.

If you hate being downvoted because of disagreement, why would you want to bring more users who default to that behavior?

I also do not believe you should have any more power or capacity in the fediverse. It's clear to me by your behavior in this thread that even basic things like being downvoted can set you off and make you decide to try to start a witch hunt.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Reddit promoted "downvote to disagree" and this is a consequence of the userbase having migrated from there.

You can say whatever you want about how it should work, but the bottom line is that most people using vote-based systems are voting up and down based on if they agree with what's posted. It hasn't been "downvote for off-topic" for over a decade.

This guy wants to bring more redditors to the site, the people actively perpetuating downvote to disagree.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, you are resorting to actively aggressive behavior in response to internet points.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Can you please explain why it matters?

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's so weird to keep track of that, and petty on both sides if it has been happening for months like you say.

I also think you are placing way too high importance on vote counts, and specifically pinging people is not the way to handle your disapproval.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

I am not catloaf but I have a problem with people literally combing vote logs to call users out in comments. That's toxic verging on obsessive.

Absolutely not the way to act as the face of a project. It accomplishes nothing besides making you look incredibly petty and dissuades people from supporting your work.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 42 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I like "Product Degradation" way better than "enshittification".

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Deleted comment was praising GitHub Copilot.

It's literally just a glorified autocorrect and suggestion feature.

It also suggests complete stochastic garbage most of the time. When I type "list" sometimes it will try to infer that I am writing a cookbook and try to autofill to "of ingredients" or even further.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

I like how part of Meer's logic is that he's basically inescapable in the franchise otherwise, since he voices so many NPCs as well as BroShep. He boils it down to listening to him some of the time or all of the time.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It definitely is not an optimized game. It doesn't run really well on my ROG Ally, so I can't imagine trying to do it on a Switch.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You can check the md5 hash checksum provided by Microsoft to verify the authenticity. Massgrave gets it from Microsoft, it's a legit ISO just rehosted.

view more: next ›