charonn0

joined 2 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

require every company operating within the US to show users exactly what data is collected and allow them to delete any or all of it as desired

That would be a very different kind of law from the one we're talking about.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That's a separate issue that could not be addressed with this kind of law anyway.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

Can you explain why you feel that would even be necessary?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago (15 children)

I've actually read the law, so no one has to tell me that it really, actually is about privacy. I know that it is.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 48 points 8 months ago (18 children)

Chew responded to the latest moves in a video posted by the official TikTok account. "Make no mistake, this is a ban," Chew said in the video. "A ban on TikTok and a ban on you and your voice."

Narrator: it wasn't.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or else what?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 9 months ago

The only difference between TikTok and other social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram is that TikTok is Chinese owned.

The law would also appy to Russia, Iran, and North Korea.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago

The US government demanded access to the US based social media companies to pull whatever sensitive information they wanted. They just don’t want China to have the same access.

Or Russia, Iran, or North Korea.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Those companies are already based in the US.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

"Assault with a deadly weapon or instrument other than a firearm" (CPC 245(a)(1)) can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the exact circumstances.

view more: ‹ prev next ›