If you believe Trump, yes.
So in reality, no, not in any sense.
charonn0
joined 2 years ago
Sounds like a fatal problem. That's a shame.
Which is exactly why the output of an AI trained on copyrighted inputs should not be copyrightable. It should not become the private property of whichever company owns the language model. That would be bad for a lot more reasons than the potential for laundering open source code.
The part that you're apparently having trouble understanding is that a language model is not a human mind and a human mind is not a language model.
If it's not infringement to input copyrighted materials, then it's not infringement to take the output.
Copyright can be enforced at both ends or neither end, not one or the other.
And their Christofascist fans don't even realize it's a sin to consult a psychic.
That's kind of the point.
Clementine originally forked from Amarok 1.4 because Amarok 2.0 changed too much.
What does this mean for shows and movies that I purchased? Will they have ads unless I pony up? If I cancel Prime will I lose access to them?
Because SI prefixes are always powers of the base. Base 10 is the most common, but that's more human psychology that math.
The fact that you assume this would be a shocking or objectionable suggestion speaks volumes.