cloudless

joined 9 months ago
[–] cloudless@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

The only platformer I played and enjoyed using the keyboard.

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

Exactly. That's the idea, and Copilot seems to understand it.

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

create a photorealistic image based on this: 👱‍♀️😡➡️🐱🍽️😾

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Prompt (Copilot):

create an image based on this: 👱‍♀️😡➡️🐱🍽️😾

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Her face looks very natural!

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

That's super effective!

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Any celeb is fine, or even just anyone.

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bad Horse I guess

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Culinary categories mix biological types all the time - tomato (a fruit), mushroom (a fungus), seaweed (an algae) - yet all are treated as vegetables in cooking.

You're falling into a logic trap by using an overly narrow definition of 'vegetable'. A vegetable is best understood as a plant or plant-like food used in savoury dishes - and that includes mushrooms, even though they're not biologically plants.

Since 'vegetable' is a culinary term, not a scientific one, it’s not valid to reverse that and argue that mushrooms must be plants just because they're vegetables.

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In everyday conversation, mushroom is considered to be a vegetable. Even I would call that a vegetable. But I have never heard anyone (in everyday conversation) calling mushroom a plant.

By the way, strawberries are not technically nuts. They are actually considered an aggregate accessory fruit.

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That’s syllogism.

Just because it is considered a vegetable in culinary terms, doesn’t make it a plant in biological classification.

view more: next ›