I like that phrasing.
cygnus
joined 2 years ago
That's true, but to reuse my comparison to Romans, we call Augustus "emperor" too despite the term "imperator" being co-opted from an earlier, different meaning. I can see both points of view here, I just don't feel strongly enough to see it as a red flag. God knows there are lots of other, actual red flags.
I know, but convention is to use a person's final and highest title. Nobody refers to Julius Caesar as "quaestor".
I don't think the Merkel comparison is accurate - no one called her Leader, we called her the Chancellor (Kanzler), because that's the job title. "Chancellor" is a pretty specific word in English with a narrower meaning and clearer connotation than "leader", which can be used in a huge variety of contexts. The problem is that English doesn't have a 1:1 translation of Fuehrer as we do with Kanzler, and "leader" is too generic versus Chancellor, Prime Minister, President, etc. Maybe "Supreme Leader" would work, but I haven't seen that used often enough for it to stick.
We also use "Dalai Lama", for example. Changing it to "leader" would lose a lot in translation. There's a very long list of more problematic things with Musk and this ego project than this particular wording choice.
Could be, but Rust has been around long enough that we'd see this already, no?
I feel like I’ve seen an insane number of error messages in various apps and websites around the unwrap method.
I suspect this is related to LLM usage somehow. We'll probably see a lot more of this type of problem (sudden flareups of a particular bad code implementation)
It's OK, you're on Lemmy, we all use Linux here so you're among friends (or bitter enemies if your distro of choice is Ubuntu)
You may be right, but I hope you aren't.
The dotcom crash was no joke. Most people here weren't around for it (as adults at least) so they brush it off. I'm not saying this next crash won't be bad, I'm saying it won't have the knock-on liquidity effects of 2008.
I believe the reliance on index type funds has increased at a drastic rate.
Very good point, although this will disproportionately harm regular folks like us, and the people in charge don't really care about that so it won't be as disruptive as somebody important (like a bank or a hedge fund, neither of which rely on index funds) getting into financial trouble.
It's worth it for the Elon burn alone.