daq

joined 2 years ago
[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't really replace it though. Pretty much every modern car sold today has Bluetooth. You don't have to use android auto.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I completely agree, but despite OP or Samsung looking better on paper, overall experience is just so much smoother. Shit just works. And at some point I began to value that over specs.

Just for some perspective, I'm basing what I'm saying on OP 3T, 5T and 8Pro, Samsung S21 and Pixel 8 pro and currently 9 pro fold.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nah, I'm not doing back to OP. I hate to say it, but If you're going to use android, nothing beats pixels. Not even close.

If GrapheneOS manages to actually work with a decent hardware maker to get a phone to the market, I'll get that next, but only if Android auto and banking apps work. Phone's useless to me without those.

Only reason I'd give those up is if I can get another Linux phone as polished as Nokia N9. Still the best phone I've ever owned.

Not a popular opinion, but if those two options are unavailable, I'd rather switch to iPhone than use a non pixel android.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Oneplus had great success but then enshittified. Raised prices to match Samsung and Google, outsourced support to some place that didn't sound like they were even in the same dimension as any English speakers and took away their ability to help customers even by accident and finally quality of their phones went to shit.

They could've sucked the Chinese government subsidy tit for another few years and would've established themselves as legit competition, but that would only delay inevitable enshittification by a few years.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't work for every use case, but perfect for mine. I was just pointing out other options.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Valid points. I use it for my media collection I can easily restore and won't miss. Cache would be sort of nice to have and redundancy would just be wasting space.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Mergerfs can do that too and you can keep the underlying fs as whatever you want.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago

Ah, makes sense. I don't mind sharing history and have never used bookmarks or customized any settings.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

This is what I do now, just trying to figure out why ff keeps spending time on profiles. Do they have any advantages over containers?

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I think containers (that Firefox already has) are a much better way to handle this. Profiles, art least the way they are implemented on chrome, feels like a massive downgrade.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 months ago

Is this for people that are able to transfer themselves? Because Uber WAV works just fine. Used it several times without any issues other than extended wait times due to small number of appropriate cars.

Also, I'm willing to bet real money this issue is caused by assholes claiming their chihuahuas are service animals and not by Uber drivers rejecting to drive blind people or people in wheelchairs.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Curve is not available in US and has terrible reviews on Play store.

I'd switch in a heartbeat, but I can't live without a smart watch and having to pay with physical cc again would be a massive downgrade.

I have a suspicion that all the android clones will become a much worse/unusable experience once Google implements these changes.

 
# sudo btrfs fi df /mnt/disk3
Data, single: total=12.70TiB, used=12.27TiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=1.34MiB
Metadata, DUP: total=15.00GiB, used=14.50GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=608.00KiB

# mkdir /mnt/disk3/tst
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘tst’: No space left on device

I suspect this is BTRFS balancing issue, but even BTRFS's own utility is indicating there's still SOME space left. Certainly should be enough to create a directory.

Any ideas?

Just in general BTRFS default options for creating new volumes seem to not work well for disks that I intend to fill completely immediately after formatting. Are there better options for this use case? I just use

# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdd1

view more: next ›