deadbeef79000

joined 1 year ago
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, nor hell a fury like a woman scorned.

"Scorned" in this context is equivalent to our contemporary "betrayed".

She's been passed over for reward by Trump.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 5 days ago

Though today we get:

Find out what these big four names were convicted of!

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's correct, as much as any English is correct, but not typically spoken naturally like that.

The press (newspapers) has an idiosyncratic grammar, probably born of maximising space in a newspaper column. Headlines are often grammatical nightmares, body copy less so.

One could think of it as a form of semantic compression.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 week ago

I trialled both a while ago, chose ummich asits face recognition was superior.

There were other reasons, but I've forgotten them.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 week ago

If you're using LVM, ZFS, or Btrfs then you can use their features and tooling to migrate data from one disk to the other, assuming you're able to connect both at the same time.

I've done this online with btrfs several times now and it's quite painless, admittedly only for self hosted stuff.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

Pickling the onion

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I bought a refurbished SFF PC and put a PCIe NIC in it. Installed opnSense.

Cheap as chips. Supremely powerful.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not saying it was aliens, but it was aliens.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 154 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Another bullshit passive-voice headline. Written implying the fault was not with the LAPD.

"LAPD officers destroy MRI machine in bungled pot raid"

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago

I still double-check my CIDR's/netmasks and expected ranges with a tool (some online one or other). Easier to avoid silly mistakes or typo's

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

TL;DR: it depends entirely on the DHCP server software.

Generally the safe/reliable policy is to assign a smaller DHCP range (or ranges) and allocate static assignments outside of the DHCP range(s).

Assume your network is 192.168.1.0/24.

Specify 192.168.1.128/25 for DHCP, which means all DHCP addresses will be above 192.168.1.128.

This leaves you everything below 192.168.1.127 for static assignments.

view more: next ›