deaf_fish

I don't think they are techno-solutionists but that sometimes is the vibe they give off.

I just think there's some directions they won't go thanks to the threat of capital.

Until voting doesn't count, this is a fed post.

Ehh, it can definitely push you further down that path, but thought doesn't magically make things happen. Otherwise we wouldn't have an incel problem.

Don't worry, we were never going to make anything 100% accessible anyway, that would be impossible.

Christian nationalists say that porn shouldn't exist while watching a lot of porn and they would get mad if someone took away their porn. They only want others to not watch porn.

Ah, my bad, my brain erroneously conflated paying people with private companies. Thanks for catching me on that. I am fine with it being done in the public center as long as there isn't a more anonymous way of age verification. There may be a public private key cryptography thing we could use instead. I don't know if this has been explored yet.

Let this man watch porn without giving out any of his personal information. I too want to watch porn without giving out any of my personal information. You do too, if you watch porn.

I like the rest of your points, but moving verification off to a different private companies is not solving anything. Why would a second company not sell your data or make it easy to steal?

Edit: Ah, my bad, my brain erroneously conflated paying people with private companies.

Isn't there an open source port of this?

Ah, ok, 99% chance you're a troll. 1% chance that you're deeply mentally challenged and it's a miracle that you can type out sentences.

What if you refuse to bake a cake because you have no sugar?

No one with a brain is suggesting this. It should be up to the service and government to create rules to allow or not allow harmful content. It should definitely not be a payment processor.