That's not what the article is about. Stack Overflow has kept content that Luigi created up, but removed his username, in violation of Creative Commons. Edited the post to make that more clear.
dexa_scantron
Preemptive compliance.
Do you have other examples? Because the article gave an example of a similar account that was not anonynized like this. Sure, accounts are often taken down, but the content isn't left up.
404 Media is doing excellent work; if you like this kind of thing you might want to sign up for their newsletter.
I thought it meant that all the icons/interfaces for AI seem to have a graphical gradient between colors, usually cool colors like blue/purple/pink. (Like the face in the meme)
I believe they do this the same way they do traffic jams, by seeing how many android phones are at the location vs. average.
Me too, I hate it! Not in a "let's ban it" way, just in the skin-crawly way that lots of people can't stand to see pictures of spiders, or like body horror.
And Onion articles, and other satire.
You didn't read the article. These are images that appeared in the documentary and were not marked as generated. It was implied they were real photos.
The bridge in Baltimore collapsing after its pier was hit by a cargo ship.
Yeah, I edited the post to call that out specifically