drspod

joined 2 years ago
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've had this one in my images folder for at least a couple of decades. No idea where I saved it from:

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The binary blobs match which checksums? The ones provided by the ventoy developer?

GLIM is an alternative that's much simpler (it just uses Grub configs) so it is easy to audit:

https://github.com/thias/glim

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Please don't continue to recommend Ventoy. It has serious and unanswered security questions hanging over it, and the developer seems to be completely AWOL.

https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/issues/2795

https://lemmy.ml/post/20404494

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did you read the article?

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you think that I'm misunderstanding something and arguing from a false premise then please feel free to engage with the discussion.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I thought passkeys were supposed to be a hardware device?

This is typical embrace/extend/extinguish behavior from the large platforms that don't want their web-SSO hegemony challenged because it would mean less data collection and less vendor lock-in.

The whole idea of passkeys provided by an online platform should have been ruled out by the specification. It completely defeats the purpose of passkeys which is that the user has everything they need to authenticate themself.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's pretty easy to check and see that this isn't how it works. I checked both my instance and yours and both of them host the images that have been posted to communities on other instances, so clearly images are transferred (or cached) between instances.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Goodhart's law is an adage often stated as, "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure"

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Sorry, there’s no way Qualcomm is buying Intel as is

At the end of its third quarter of its fiscal 2024, [...] Qualcomm had $7.8 billion in cash and [...] just over $23 billion in total assets. That means Qualcomm, [...] is almost certainly looking at a stock-for-stock transaction. As of writing, Qualcomm's market cap is $188 billion, just more than double that of Intel's at $93 billion.

In fact, Chipzilla may not be worth much to Qualcomm unless it can renegotiate the x86/x86-64 cross-licensing patent agreement between Intel and AMD, which dates back to 2009. That agreement is terminated if a change in control happens at either Intel or AMD.

While a number of the patents expired in 2021, it's our understanding that agreement is still in force and Qualcomm would be subject to change of control rules. In other words, Qualcomm wouldn't be able to produce Intel-designed x86-64 chips unless AMD gave the green light.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

The amount of advertising for this tool in recent times is starting to look a lot like astroturfing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›