dubyakay

joined 1 year ago
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

There are white Christians in Palestine. So at this point it's just "they are not our females".

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've seen videos too. LASIK with double laser is the least intrusive. Pop a Xanax and fifteen minutes later it's over.

I was enjoying the light show a lot. Very interesting experience and would do it again in a heartbeat if needed.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Do you have an option for eye surgery?

I did it with -8/9 R/L and they sit at -0.5/1 diopter now nine years post LASIK. Best decision I've ever made.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 22 points 7 months ago (4 children)

People Team. It's called People Team now.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Umm. That's his padding to stop a bullet.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Those reasons sound retarded. Having a loss leader product or line just means you are recouping it elsewhere. It's a draw-in, like $1.25 hotdogs at Costco. It's different than if your whole business operates at a loss for a certain time in order to squeeze out competition. The only way this would make even marginally sense is if say both IKEA and JYSK had a cafeteria and IKEA decided to sell food at a loss while JYSK would not be able to afford in that segment.

From what I know, it's not actually China subsidizing shipping, but the individual target countries instead, mostly on taxpayer money. This wouldn't be bad in practice, except that goods not originating from China do not have subsidized shipping, thus the unfair advantage.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 months ago

Check mate, Agnostics!!!!

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are the trees frozen or the suckers?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Even if the government subsidizes it, the company selling it is already for profit selling it at a higher price point. The government can only subsidize so much.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's almost like a for-profit utilities company will... go for profit.

Really bad example.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago (8 children)

No. It's because you guys are wrong. Nuclear is more expensive than the others only if the others get subsidies but Nuclear doesn't.

In Canada, Québec is 100% hydro, Ontario is 75% nuclear (the rest is hydro). Yet both provinces have some of the cheapest kWh rates in the western world.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Huh? What kind of Buddhist group requires you to be so in? Kind of antithetical to Buddhism.

view more: ‹ prev next ›