EA: It's in the grave!
(Hopefully)
ech
joined 1 year ago
it is also somewhat misleading
...what? No it isn't. Restricting the premise from infinite to any finite amount of time completely negates it. That doesn't prove it's "misleading", it proves anyone that thinks it does has no idea what they're talking about.
What are we supposed to do[...]?
All of these articles treat energy usage like a massive crime, but miss/ignore that the world's energy use needs to go up as we increasingly turn to electric alternatives. The problem truly lies in how we generate electricity, not how we use it.
So the actual answer to your question is intense and rapid investment in sustainable, non-carbon energy production. An infrastructure revamp to rival any other in history. It would've been far better to do so decades ago, but that's no longer an option. Anything else is just half measures we can't afford.
I didn't read the article, but wouldn't the site see the phone as soon as it's taken out of the bag? Unless the plan is to leave the phone in the bag the whole time, at which point it seems easier to just leave it behind.
This was my first thought too, hah.
If you're going to argue in bad faith, you should at the very least understand the words in the comment and how they are being used.
I'm not saying he's lying, but maybe give it a moment before rewarding someone for doing basic damage control after doing/saying something heinous. Redemption isn't an instantaneous process.
For the time being at least, there are options to still use the cleaner search results. For Firefox, this post walks through how to set it up: https://lemm.ee/post/42488635/14853159
It's not "admitting" anything. It's literally just creating text based on the last few things you said.
Their profit from the device was all worked out ahead of time in the contract, and no business is going to freely lessen their return out of a contract. What the person you responded to was suggesting is making the removal of the equipment a non-issue instead of just assuming a business will throw away money.
Profit doesn't incur ownership or liability for property that's not theirs.
I just want to voice my opinion that not every article about video games needs to be shared/promoted, particularly gamergate-lite shit like this. "Only" whinging about how non-cis white male characters are included in games is hardly any better than the chuds bombing the game on metacritic.
I'd also argue this violates your own sub's rule (rule 9), not because it's about "political" genders, but for explicitly calling peoples' existence "political messaging".