electricprism

joined 4 years ago
[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

I hope the followup is named "Wilson"

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Sometimes it seems like it's by design.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

The need for decentralization & federation is self evident.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago

Microsoft: Am I a joke?

My guy you are an entire circus.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

3 hour mandatory meetings 3 times a week

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

So the flip side of 501(c)(3) is that all the donors information is shared with the IRS instead of remaining private.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Flawlessly accurate, everyone seems to always work an angle, the current system has no way of navigating this reality.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago
[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Content moderation should be "opt-in".

Each community should have overlapping moderation teams -- the user can subscribe or unsubscribe to the " filters" those moderators create.

The user should be put at the middle of the world and the user should be given supreme authority over which blocklists, content filters they subscribe to the same as which communities.

They should be able to discriminate against users whose profiles contain various emojis or flags stating their affiliations should they so choose.

If the user wants to avoid content from evangelicals and activist groups they dislike they should be given the tools to hide posts from those people.

None of this should be decided for them, they should decide for themselves.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Upvote/downvote system turns content to a "popularity contest".

There is no way to categorize content by " funny", "insightful", " serious", "scientific", " helpful", etc...

Steam is a good example of this done right, comments can be given Trophies, misskey does Emoji's IIRC

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

So far my claims are:

  1. Linux is not Unix

  2. Linux is not "based" on Unix

I've proven both claims using respected sources.

From your reading, the missing clarification you are looking for is "POSIX". Most people don't know what POSIX is, that's why it reads "Unix-Like" for general audiences. If Unix didn't exist another synonym would supplement.

Back to my original point -- the OP, a layman, probably in good faith and though a honest misunderstanding, repeated a false claim that was resolved in a International 10+ year lawsuit in 2007.

It's literally mal-information. But hey in sure your elders think that a Xbox, PS5 and Computer are all "Nintendo's or whatever".

view more: ‹ prev next ›