elephantium

joined 2 years ago
[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I heard about voat back in the day and thought "Oh, cool, like reddit without some of the overbearing crap from the admins".

Then I went to voat and read a few posts.

Well, shit. I didn't want to be on a nazi site. So much for that.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also, you don’t need to uncompress plain text.

Content-Encoding: gzip would like a word. :P

Agreed on all points other than that nitpick

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Alexander, is that you?

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But in space its the only option you have

Hmm, this has me thinking about the stealth ships in The Expanse. The engineering needed to make it work makes me want to cry, but in principle you could run a Peltier cooler with a swappable heat sink.

To be clear, I don't think this is a viable option, but it's interesting to think about.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I lean towards discounting both rumors. I think the temptation to use said kill-switches would prove too great to resist, particularly for the authoritarian types involved.

We saw this a lot with provisions of the "PATRIOT Act". It was championed as tools needed to combat terrorists and claimed to be reserved for such cases. In actuality, it was used to go after people running fan sites for sci-fi tv shows, among other things.

If such a kill switch existed in computer hardware, I'm sure it would have been used already. I'm less sure about a kill switch in the planes. On one hand, that's a pretty situational tool, and you wouldn't want to play that card until you really needed it.

OTOH, we didn't hear about threats to throw the kill switch during the bluster over Greenland. If they had one, I think it would have been part of that bluster.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Because I'm not a sociopath. In this theoretical happily-ever-after dating app, I want to make people happy by connecting them with the right other people. Ongoing business comes from happy couples giving word of mouth recommendations to their friends and family, not from trying to lock in a misery subscription.

Maybe I'm old fashioned. I remember a time when capitalism meant "make money by doing something helpful for people" instead of rent-seeking bamboozle profits.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

any kind of dating app is self-detrimental for revenue

It doesn't have to be. In the US, about 4 million people turn 18 every year. Let's say you get all of them signed up and all of them optimally paired off. You still have another 4 million new signups next year. Until the world falls off a demographic cliff, you've got an evergreen customer population.

That being said, the well is VERY poisoned at this point. The match group is a cancer on our society.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm still annoyed that they deleted classic D2 from my battle.net account. I used to be able to download that and get several classic games installed from registering CD keys back in the day. Now it's just a prompt to buy remastered :(

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

It's just one of reddit's autogenerated usernames. It looks like another post in this thread talks a bit about it.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are they seeing a payoff or just not admitting defeat (yet)?

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I get that, like blocking should be an extreme step?

But for me it's kind of a defensive measure. I feel political-flooded basically all the time online. There's no respite, so I have to carve out what sanity I can.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, I block posters and communities pretty quickly when I see politics. I already feel like I have to add to that list way too much. Worse would be "I can't even click Next without needing to block another one".

view more: next ›