exocrinous

joined 2 years ago
[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

Go play Blades In The Dark or Monster Of The Week

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Everything will be fine when all the new RPGs in the works over the OGL drama come out. Ain't critical role making an rpg or something? I hate critical role but I'm eager for them to get all the critical role fans playing a different system than D&D. More excited about the mcdm rpg personally

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

The last obsidian game I played, Tyranny, turns to absolute crap halfway through

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

The bikes you can make in totk aren't as fun

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Damn bro that ass is tight af. I wonder what you look like with the lights turned on, you handsome boy."

"I'm a woman, anon."

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not literal but I do just... Not have as much fun with totk as I did back in the day with botw.

Also botw has a motorcycle

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago

Saying that Blizzard pursues profit at all costs is inaccurate, unfair, and frankly slanderous.

Blizzard would NEVER sacrifice their rampant misogyny to make more money

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 8 points 2 years ago

So, still stealing breast milk?

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If TotK is mid then what's a great game in the same genre?

Breath of the Wild

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

I am also a not American

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Well the thing is, the budget is that small. Otherwise why would there be a five year waitlist for government housing? You're talking like a budget that could house everyone but only in boring housing is small. But the current budget, there's no way it can house everyone in any conditions at all. Every extra apartment we can build is another person off the street or out of the homeless shelters. That's the scale we're talking about here. There is no extra, there is no slack, and there's nothing we could possibly do to stretch the budget enough to create slack. But what we can do is stretch the budget enough to give one more person a home, and I think that's the most important thing.

Sorry, I did say if the government built block housing there would be almost no homeless. I was at the time imagining a fantasy world where the government gets its shit together and actually tries to solve the homeless problem. Take this current comment as assuming that the government doesn't decide to tax the rich appropriately to fund this endeavour.

view more: ‹ prev next ›