faythofdragons

joined 6 months ago
[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nobody deserves this kind of pain

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Tbh, yeah. I'm a woman with an inoperable brain tumor, and I can completely understand why people would be reluctant to accept "nothing to be done" as a real answer.

If I thought I deserved to live, I'd probably talk to a LLM about it because this topic drags everybody down, and my therapist only sees me once a week. Though, I've heard its good for helping people not live, so maybe its worth a shot after all.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's been a hot minute since I played it, but I remember a lot of his backstory is hidden behind player choices. You may have to play through multiple times or just look up spoilers to get the whole thing.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 24 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Adam Smasher is actually evil, yes. Anon is ignoring large swaths of backstory for this greentext, lol.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just don't know how they're getting away with calling it 'full self driving' if it's not fully self driving.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

It sorta feels like they hit 'AOC was a bartender' and then Pavlov kicked in and they started drooling.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For any other game, I'd agree, but cyberpunk being full of chrome is an aesthetic that predates the video games by a fair margin, haha.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm just confused because somebody said "it's not important he was a gardner, it's important that he's unqualified", and you jumped in with a "I disagree, its important he's not qualified" and I'm just lost.

Like, are you saying its important to focus on his lack of qualifications, or are you saying you disagree with that?

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You say your point and their point are different, and I'm not seeing the differences? From my end, it looks like you're saying the same thing, just with different words.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'mma quote from the post you responded to, maybe you can help me see what I'm missing.

…I guess my point is that gardening and entry-level-grocery are completely fine and expected experience for a 22 year old; but that no 22 year old could have the experience to do well as a leader in terror prevention. So, there’s a distinction between criticizing the absence of experience (justified), vs criticizing someone for having actual experience in an unrelated field (bullshit).

Where does your argument contradict that?

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I'm confused, this reads like an argument, but you're making the same point.

view more: next ›