According to the docs, running snapper rollback should set the right snapshot as the default.
federalreverse
joined 1 year ago
Ah! In that case I misunderstood you, sorry!
You can find out:
snapper --iso list should include a column "Used space" in its output.
snapper delete --sync *ID* deletes a snapshot and frees up space.
Nb: I am not a Snapper user personally. The link above takes you to the official docs.
People here buy desktops only for gaming/content creation, which means most households here doesn't need/require a desktop.
You just described the entire world. This is far from unique to India. Most people I know don't have a desktop and maybe have a laptop, and I live in North America.
Pretty sure that they mean that most people's only device is a phone. Desktops and laptops are basically the same thing, packaged slightly differently.
H is for half year. So, H1 = first half of the year.
Also, I never knew the four-digit build numbers were related to months. I always thought they were just creating builds and seeing which ones stick. Those that didn't wouldn't be shipped.
They could’ve sold Windows 2000 as Windows NT 5 and Windows Me as Windows 2000; that would’ve kept the “NT X” versioning scheme for the professional line and the year-based scheme for the consumer line.
That's true of course. But iirc, Microsoft itself was on the fence of whether to release Me at all or whether to go straight to what would become XP, the release that united both lines of Windows. I guess that might explain somewhat why the NT product people felt it ok to steal the year-based versioning scheme of DOS-based Windows..?
Actually, you're speaking about three product lines: Xboxes, regular old Windows, and Windows NT. Hence also the weird contortions with Windows Me ("Millennium Edition"): They couldn't name it Windows 2000, because that version had been released half a year earlier. They couldn't really name it Windows 2001 either, because that would have implied it being better than (or even related to) Windows 2000.
I am not using it, but you can also try Opensuse Kubic. The twist here is that you don't get a completely immutable ISO-type base installation but rather you have an at-boot updateable/customizable base installation image that can't be changed while the OS is running.
Not to be overly cynical, but including competitors can make sense from an SEO perspective, because it means people may find your site while searching for a competing distro.
I am not sure I would necessarily call them a "good company" either.
If we're being honest, the phone project was a delusion from the start—the company is simply way too small to build a phone from components that were never meant to be in phones and have it actually work properly. At this point, can you finally even use the phone to call people via 2G/4G? Have they gotten beyond the sub-24h standby battery life? Have they got the bandwidth to handle the security reviews of the kill switches in their phones?
In the plus side, I appreciate that they invested in implementing adaptive layouts in Gnome. But the Linux space is littered with unsuccessful startups who all left their pawprints in code. Usually then allowing Red Hat and other big players (or, in the desktop space: a community) to build upon that code.
Yeah ... My cursory knowledge about Purism says that's a very risky investment.
Planets are (or maybe, used to be?) a good way to learn about people involved in projects, e.g.:
I guess you get the gist.
Planets are a periodically updated collection of blogs on a topic that were very popular in the 2000s and early 2010s.