Ah ok. This is a very sensible change. I never post, but I interact probably once a month or so.
figaro
After 7 years the bankruptcy disappears from your credit report. After that it's like it didn't happen.
Ever watch a vtuber stream? There's apparently people out there with cash to just burn.
Eat your freakin pizza
Cool lemme just build a train really quick to my work, great idea
Like I get what this is saying and all, and I will vote for anyone who supports this kind of thing, but telling me not to drive my car is not the solution.
I am all for a temporary defederation.
.world has power. It has the people and the content. Flexing a little in support of human rights is 100% a good thing.
Dude every phone in Japan makes a horrible alert siren "Woop Woop" sound when there is an earthquake. Anyone who was accessing Twitter definitely 100% already knows there is an earthquake coming.
Yeah I intentionally didn't go through their post history. Don't have time for that lol. I mostly wrote that out for anyone who read his post and thought maybe there wasn't a counter argument to what he said.
I don't like the idea of conflating falsely accusing people of being a pedophile with calling someone out for holding harmful right-wing beliefs.
The first (saying someone is supporting pedophiles) is oftentimes used as a method to support bans on anti-encryption technology. It is a bad-faith justification for harmful and 1984 type legislation.
The second, however, is an argument used by right wing extremists to justify hate speech.
To be clear - I'm not saying the government should mandate a ban on conservative media. I'm just saying that as a normal citizen, it is a justified, non-harmful act to call people with harmful right-wing beliefs 'right wing extremists.'
Look I'm not judging I'm just saying you could have been at least listening to a podcast