fishos

Exactly. If this minimal effort is keeping people out - GOOD. If you can't put the bare minimum effort in, then you'll just be another mindless TikTok type person and we really don't need those.

...so.... content filters when? Let me limit it to certain subjects and I don't need social media anymore 😂

I literally posted a comment back then saying "sure is odd that this is happening right before the US election. Not saying it means anything, but maybe it's not a coincidence?" and got downvoted to hell lmao.

I never said bots were the problem. I said people caring more about popularity is the problem and that once you realize this it's super easy to program bots to imitate people by up voting/down voting what you want. But yes, call me dense when you've misconstrued my argument from day one.

Edit: didn't look like my previous comment posted so I rewrote it. Considering how dense you are tho, maybe two versions will help you finally understand, so I'll just leave it.

Because I never said bots are to blame. People are and once you realize that, programming a bot to do what people can do is super easy.

I get offended when people try to tell me I made an argument I never made. But thanks again buddy 👍

Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I'll wait. Might take you awhile but I'll wait.

You miss my meaning. All the servers that your info passes through, all the cell towers, etc, can and in many cases do track you(even as just routine loggings). Thinking that running anything makes you more secure while connecting to a giant public network is naive.

You ended your comment saying you completely disagree with me after reiterating what I'd just said as if it were your own thought.

You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

You know the towers log data too, right? And that websites themselves can track you regardless of what OS you use, right?

Privacy is good, but stop with this "Linux is a magic weapon" BS.

So when I wrote about bots, I was describing them as an effect created by a cause. You went and reversed the two and are thinking I blamed bots.

No.

What I said was that voting based moderation is a popularity contest. An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots. Ergo, the rise in bots all over the Internet is a consequence of our popularity based algorithms and systems. That type of moderation just doesn't work. But please, keep misunderstanding people and then blaming others. I'm sure that'll help.

If you're gonna disagree with my idea, at least get it right. You're not being downvotted heavily for not agreeing with the hive mind in the right way. You're being downvotted for lacking reading comprehension and going off on a crazy sounding tangent.

Ahhh, the rallying cry of "just downvote it". I'd insert the "this your first time?" gif here if I could. Leaving a community to self moderate invariably turns into a popularity contest, and then when one group eventually takes over, an echo chamber usually filled with the same regurgitated spam. "If you don't like it just downvote it" or it's reverse "well it has a lot of upvotes, so someone must like it"(welcome to why we have so many bots today....) always ends up catering to the terminally online at the detriment of the average person. People far too often will speak with absolute confidence about things they have never even experienced, but because it's well formatted, it's sent to the top. The Gell-Mann Amnesia effect describes this in part.

I agree with this. The tie looks too business/professional. The bowtie has a certain charm. But it needs to be like "neon bus seat" design. You know the one I'm talking about. Or like water cups from the 90s.