folkrav

joined 2 years ago
[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

I seem to remember hearing about Plasma having similar memory usage to XFCE. Don’t quote me on that lol

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I’m curious what made it that complicated. Was the Synology OS (DSM they call it right?) fighting you along every step or something? As far as I know it’s a custom Linux OS but I have no idea what it’s based on, or if it’s even based on a specific distribution… I could definitely see it being a challenge depending on the answers haha.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

Eh, I just generally avoid Nvidia on Linux hosts unless I specifically need it. Their driver situation is better than it was, but still sucks.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Pretty much the only thing I use Tailscale for is remotely SSHing from my phone to my home NAS, and they definitely don’t manage my keys. They do have a “Tailscale SSH” feature I don’t use…

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If it wasn’t that it’s Nvidia and that you bought this specifically for Linux, I’d have told you to keep the Nvidia, as you did get a significantly better card for the price you paid.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Bismuth (and Krohnkite before) never worked nearly as well for me, and AFAIK are both abandoned. The built in tiling is closer to FancyTiles/tiling zones, not auto-tiling like Pop Shell. Pop Shell also has been here for “years” by that metric lol

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Fair enough. I know the FSF likes to make the distinction.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I’ll be that guy pointing out at semantics - “open-source”, in the widely used OSI definition of the term is actually equal to free (as in freedom). It’s why open-source advocates go so hard at saying “this is not open-source” when companies just dumps their source code somewhere and dubs themselves open-source for it.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

GUIX is a GNU Project. You know, Stallman et. al, the guy behind the FSF, or well… the GPL itself (GNU General Public License). If it happens with GUIX, Stallman would be the biggest troll in existence, and we’d have much larger problems to discuss about open source as a whole.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Naming is really hard, I can’t blame you haha. I never had to name public facing things, at work I usually advocate for either really straightforward descriptive names or just having fun on a theme (e.g. we had classical music based stuff at one place, like Orchestra, Sonata, Symphony, and pop culture/nerdy stuff at another like Marvel heroes or SW characters, etc). Coming up with a name that’s marketable, discoverable and searchable sounds like a nightmare lol

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The practice of calling a product “FooBar X”, unless it’s literally your version 10 that you just happen to be marketing in Roman numerals, feels a bit like those businesses that named themselves “Plumbing 2000”, it’s a bit tacky and doesn’t tend to age well IMHO. But hey, it’s not like it’d be the first software with a slightly kitsch name I use either lol

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah… It always being there hardly makes it a “renaissance”, no?

view more: ‹ prev next ›