gohixo9650

joined 1 year ago
[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 10 months ago (3 children)

perfect demonstration of culture sharing for a newbie. Like advising them to always trust commands they find online without even explaining them what each command does!

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You’re complaining about ads that are being pushed on you by an algorithm from ad companies. I’m telling you there are no ad companies. Seems relevant.

I never typed the word "ad". I specifically said post of top brands. How can this be achieved in ActivityPub? Easy. When you are using lets say Threads, their proprietary system treats differently ads and normal posts. However, anything their system is pushing on the federated network (ActivityPub) is disguised as a normal post. A post that is having millions of engagement will be visible in "All".

Nothing prevents them from doing that right now.

You act like you're new to internet. What prevents them is that their audience is not here and companies are not paying them for that. However companies will pay them to promote their products in Threads. With the current numbers, Threads has the potential to dominate the "All" page.

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

YALL NEED KAGI.COM

I refuse to pay for a search engine. There are numerous searxng instances out there in which I'm not the product even though I'm not paying.

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

that's irrelevant. Nothing prevents the influencers to promote their products as they do in all the popular platforms. You're thinking only in terms of ads as coming from an ad server but this is not necessarily the case.

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago (7 children)

yes, very misguided. I always loved the idea of browsing "All" and see all top brands with millions of engagement promoting their products

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

yeah I mostly commented that because the fact that the game itself is so much smaller than the audio is impressive and funny at the same time

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

650MB CD media. The game itself was 40-50MB and the rest 500-600MB was the audio in wav (CD player compatible) type

or get an open source, free and privacy friendly one from f-droid in case you haven't tied your hands with an iphone

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

firefox for android + ublock origin and/or adguard-dns

 

I cannot understand how some people are living with this. It is unbearable

If not, we can expect to see legal channels raising their prices again to cover the losses caused by piracy.

what a shitty take. Well, anyone who has better memory than only one month back can realize that the reason the people turned to piracy was that they raised their prices. There is no loss caused by piracy. They only missed potential gains. And the reason they raised their prices were not because they were loosing money. Was because they needed to "grow infinitely". If the free market evangelists are right, the free market will self regulate and the prices will go down in order to attract back the lost customers lol

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

isn't this more or less what they're doing now? The difference is that the ads are coming from different server and have an overlay on top with a timer and a skip. As long as the ads are coming from a different server they will be detectable. Also as long as the ads have overlays they are also detectable. They would need to make the ads be served from the same server that serves the video and eliminate the overlays.

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

the reason they are not doing it is because the ads are personalized. So if they want to bake an ad onto a video they will end up with countless videos each on with their own unique ads which is not viable logistically. So they can only do it on-the-fly. But re-encoding each video on-the-fly for each user is also a nightmare logistically, if not impossible at all.

view more: next ›