I completely agree - the party is absolutely wretched on a fundamental level and needs to be voted out of relevance. Like I replied to another comment here, however, it sounds like the guy being quoted here (not the gay Republican candidate) is just some guy speaking out against the hate in his party. From the limited context given in the article, he's not doing it because of anyone in his personal life (though that could turn out to be the case). There's obviously some cognitive dissonance there for him to think he's going to change their minds, but I give him credit for even trying.
herrcaptain
joined 1 year ago
Generally I'd agree, but the guy being quoted here isn't the candidate in question. From what we know in the article he isn't gay himself (though it's certainly possible), nor does it mention anything about people he personally knows being gay. Given only the context of the article, it sounds like he's genuinely just standing up for gay folks despite what his party overwhelmingly preaches. If that's indeed the case I think he deserves credit. And like I said, I hope this leads him toward realizing that his party is a lost cause for genuinely compassionate people and that he should take this opportunity to jump ship.
To give this dude credit, from the rest of the quote in the article it sounds like he's genuinely standing up against this sort of hate, and I expect it's at a very tangible personal cost. I find it almost unbelievable that anyone who genuinely opposes hate of a sort that's become a part of the absolute fabric of modern conservatism could still be a Republican, but apparently this dude is the exception. I hope he has the sense to get out now, but I'll take what genuine progress I can get given I've largely written off most conservatives as a lost cause.
Right? Though just imagine if routers ran Windows 11. They'd need 8 GB of RAM, phone home constantly, and have ads on the admin dashboard. Also, shoehorned in AI.
I probably shouldn't post this. Don't want to give them ideas.
Yeah, I hated KDE for like a decade but tried it again last year and was blown away. I can't imagine I'll switch off of it for a very long time.
And yeah, I always forget about competitive games as they're so not my thing.
One of us! One of us! One of us!
For real though, good on ya. It takes a little getting used to, but is so worth it in the long run to not have to fight against the profit-driven whims of a megacorp. It's also so much more customizable if you want to put together a really specific workflow for yourself.
Great article, but:
"A user-friendly distribution like Ubuntu can be an excellent choice for individuals wary of privacy and ethical issues surrounding AI," says Taylor. "It provides a robust and user-friendly environment that minimizes the tracking and data collection you’d typically encounter with macOS or Windows."
It's been quite a few years since I used desktop Ubuntu, but I remember the Unity DE back then being not so user-friendly, at least for someone coming from the Windows paradigm. I've heard (but could be misinformed) that it's gotten even more opinionated over the years. Something like Mint is likely to be a better option for a first-time user.
Also, I wish the article had mentioned Proton. It states that you may have to be willing to abandon certain games, but that's far from the reality these days. At least through Steam nearly everything works right out of the box just by enabling Proton.
Great comment, but something I'd disagree on:
As an example, Mint is built on the Ubuntu base, Bunsen is built on Debian, etc. These are often called flavors as they're not considered distros but rather something built on top of a distro.
From my understanding, those would generally still be referred to as distros in their own right. I've always understood a flavour to be a variant of a specific distro. For example, kubuntu is the KDE flavour of Ubuntu.
I was going to ask, "Who the hell pays for cheats," but then I remembered that the mobile gaming industry is a thing. Sooo, I guess there's pretty well-established precedent for this sort of nonsense.
Uh oh, don't tell Kristi Noem...
It's been quite a while, but on an older system years ago I recall it slightly nagging me about how the computer wasn't W11-enabled.
Yeah, this sounds like Ken M style pranking. Just playing the fool for some laughs. No one gets hurt, and some people might get a fun story out of it. This is what pranks are supposed to be.