Aw man, I loved opposing force so much! The idea of having allies (with their own infinite ammo!) to fight for you was everything I had ever wanted in a game.
ieatpillowtags
joined 2 years ago
The facts: An IBM subsidiary removes a reference to work done from its website.
Your take: A BRAZEN ASSAULT AGAINST ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE
Wait what? Background checks on everyone that goes in a Walmart?? That’s an insanely large number of people.
That’s less of an issue with the second game, as you can ignore the timer, but yeah that’s part of why I never really tried the first game.
How is this a relevant question? Nobody said anything about some governing body. There have been discussions on many instances about whether to federate with them or not, and it’s accurate to say that some people think we should.
I won’t even watch a movie out anymore if I can’t have a beer or three in the theater :p
What they’re actually doing is super shady, and reason enough to cause concern without exaggerating.
Agreed, but the article title implies that they are in fact currently revealing names, which is just not the case.
I swear some people are just contrary.
It seems as though nobody in this thread actually read the article. They are not revealing user names on the site. The objection here is having the real name as part of your private profile data, in case of a future data breach. It’s a real concern, but orders of magnitude less serious than what everybody is assuming.
Shame on Ars for the misleading clickbait headline.
view more: next ›
That’s typically what you get in return for an investment. The only question is if it’s enough of a share to give control or at least influence.