imPastaSyndrome

joined 2 years ago
[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're like 20 hours after someone already said that.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

This isn't Southern California media wtf, mate!

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh so it's a really fucking stupid joke, based on noting but a name in the article

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Wtf is this comment

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Projecting much?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

If only we were SO STRONG!!!

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

She has a dictionary, yeah.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Thanks, I appreciate it. The witch's evil pendant doesn't have a spell check. (Ironic, I think so)

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because remember you need a Nazi and a tankie to agree with facts in order for it to be the real truth.

Sometimes reality doesn't align with political views. Doesn't mean it's not facts

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 97 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because he'd do what about another country banning a privately owned website?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago (6 children)
[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

Hahahahahaha

Fuck'em

But the pendant in me points out that the company didn't change an internal policy for what they consider mental illness, just now theyre allowing ~~hate speech~~ "free* speech"

Now I wonder if that would pass muster as a legal argument - meta doesn't necessarily believe this as our policy, but we allow people to express their hate on this platform

view more: next ›