indigomirage

joined 1 year ago
[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Give portainer a try. It's actually pretty good for getting a birdseye view, and let's you manage more than one docker server.

It's not perfect of course.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Given how unenforceable this is (a sin of omission or source from another jurisdiction is all that's needed to skirt), will we be seeing a formalized 'certificate of authenticity' demanded by people to highlight things that are not AI?

(Maybe NFT will find find its utility? I don't know...)

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately no luck here. Same issue even when setting --unshare-all flag. I suspect I need to try a different approach.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's not the flatpak that's the issue, it's all the other stuff surrounding it that I need to contain. Much easy, potentially, if they are all in the same environment.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you! I just read that and assumed audio wouldn't. I don't have warm fuzzies about this.

That said, I'll give it a go.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Thanks - this gives me a few leads.

I know that I'm not getting a full sandbox - that's ok. Ultimately I'm trying to get bottles running in the hopes of getting a semi-contained environment for me to test out yabridge and getting reaper to load the vsts without crashing. (Reaper is the easy part, the plugins not so much...)

A modicum of isolation here (even if not complete) will help me figure things out. Obviously, if I need different kernel/flags the host will get it too.

If I unshare-devsys, will that disable audio? (I'm still trying to get a clear picture of what's shared and what isn't with distrobox/podman (with docker, it feels a bit more straightforward, but I'm not sure docker would be the right choice here...)

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I expect you can seal this off with pfblockerng.

The big issue is that they might start putting a checkpoint in place wherein the application (roku device) will not proceed unless it gets an expected response token from a call to an ad service. At that point we're at their mercy.

They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh...

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm really enjoying Fedora (just switched from Ubuntu and previously Debian). More current than Debian, doesn't have Ubuntu's canonical baggage, and more stable than Arch (nothing wrong with Arch, it's just more bleeding edge than I want for anything other than experimenting. YMMV. And Arch documentation is fantastic - I use it to help unravel issues/find solutions on other distros after a bit of translation and sanity checks).

Fedora is well inside the Gnome camp but it's basically unaltered so you feel freer to tweak and make it your own. (you can obviously run any environment you want).

Not sure if Red Hat's nonsense will infect Fedora down the road but I can switch it up if I feel like it later. (for a server, I'd just do Debian or possibly Ubuntu.)

Unfortunately, my main machine remains Windows with WSL. Too many things (of what I need) just won't run on Linux...

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Pfblockerng on pfsense is very powerful.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So much for my fibre connection...

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

Well the missing socks have to get sent somewhere... /s

view more: ‹ prev next ›