jcg

joined 1 year ago
[–] jcg@halubilo.social 19 points 8 months ago

Yeah, what do people expect? It's not like they own massive, self-sufficient data centers on several continents.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And that's really what all these guys saying "AI will take er jobs" don't understand. Good programmers are not just good coders, coding is really the easy part. They're also good analysts and listeners. I understand what he's saying - if you spend time accruing specific domain knowledge instead of computer science then you can perhaps make better, bespoke solutions because the "coding" can be handled by AI. But in present day, AI makes garbage code all the time and you'll be left there not being able to do amything about it because it doesn't make any sense to you. So who do you call? Someone who can code. Even if we get to this hypothetical dream scenario where you tell an AI to do something and it just does it perfect (gigantic IF), who's making that AI? The interface for it? The important safety nets to make sure it doesn't go on a rampage? Itself? Too much context is already lost in conversations between humans, let alone an AI. I can think of one kind of AI that would be able to do it perfectly though (assuming AIs could be perfected, that is), and that's an AI pre-equipped with full understanding of the domain. But then in that case, why do you need the human in the mix at all?

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Are you a mod of something? Might be related to that, cause I got an invite too and the only thing I can think of is I have moderation activity.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 9 points 9 months ago

Nothing you can do. This is the implicit (and sometimes explicit) contract we have with cloud services, that they'll keep our data safe and keep the lights on forever. If you think about it, though, unless you're paying for it this is untenable. A single user, when paying with their attention, will only ever generate a fairly fixed amount monthly. And yet the cost of keeping them on as a user grows steadily over time as more data is accumulated.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Man, I can't believe people fell for this. Seeing it now, the copy on the "ad" is just horrendous.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Strangely enough, Lizard predates Rock significantly but took a long time to be considered competitively fair - around the time Spock was invented.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 10 points 9 months ago

How much for your markdown files?

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 1 points 9 months ago

That would work for my... Uhm... Purposes...

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a single tense (would have - past conditional, had to - past modal, have been - pluperfect), it's a hypothetical past state being caused by a hypothetical past event, but the trick here is that the "past state" is omitted because it's contextually read. If you were giving full context it'd read: "If it was spitting out sensitive information, it would have had to have been trained on it."

Take that, ESL learners!

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is the approach I use, not sure if it'll work for your use case but I can assure you it works for at least a few users. It's all sort of manual set up but from your comments it sounds like you're just doing this for friends and family and not on an enterprise level. I admire your efforts!

First off, I have a purelymail account on which I set up domains and accounts for each user. I have mine set up so user1@anydomain.com all goes to the user1 mailbox (and user2@anydomain.com goes to the user2 inbox regardless of domain, etc.) but you can set up some pretty complex routing if you want - and if you know a bit of sieve there's even that. Purelymail handles the actual email sending/receiving so I'm putting a lot of trust in them, but it seems like they have a good track record and I don't think I could do better on my own. Plus they're dirt cheap. My big concern with email is always deliverability. Anyway, you'll see this is all set up in such a way that I'm using purelymail now, but I'm not tied down to them.

Second, I use this image (linking to the repo and not the docker hub version so you can inspect the Docker file for opsec reasons. In my set up I build it from source because I have a couple modifications) which is a dovecot IMAP server + getmail. This is python getmail not go-getmail and not fetchmail. The repo itself has some pretty straightforward instructions but the way it works is basically that users inside the docker container each map to a mail directory. So each user's credentials is actually a Linux username and password within the container. I have mine set up so it's like user1, user2, etc. (which confused my users initially because automatic set up forms are never set up this way) but you could set it up however you need. Then, there's a Cron set up to run getmail which you have to configure yourself within a cron.d folder that you mount on the container. For mine I have it configured to use POP3 so that when it gets stuff off purelymail it's automatically deleted.

Finally, you just set up your mail clients to use this IMAP server and purelymail's SMTP but if you know how to set up a forwarder you can always have it relay through purelymail. Purelymail even has the ability to relay emails to your SMTP server.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I know you're joking, but I just had the realization that S and J are probably the keys you're likely to hit when alternating two thumbs on a mobile keyboard

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 0 points 10 months ago

Make sure to attend the pre raid Google meet so we can discuss specifics

view more: ‹ prev next ›