jeffhykin

joined 2 years ago
[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What? I'm saying every federated copy must legally must have the usage restrictions. Just cause it's copied doesn't mean it can go into a for-profit LLM.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

it can apply across all of them, for example that's how copy-left works

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Sure, but it's still true that there are legal protections we can add that make it not fair game for Lemmy. At best it would be unfair-game (illegal scraping of Lemmy)

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's not fair game for for-profit bussinesses training LLM's. That's part of why Reddit made the move; so that companies would need to pay Reddit for access to the data for legally training models

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Yeah, sorry if I'm not great at communicating. That's exactly what I'm trying to point out when I said:

Even if we don't federate with them, Meta can still harvest the data so we should add these protections regardless.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As opposed to a facebook-controlled server being the top search result for Lemmy.

I see why that's confusing so I edited my comment just now

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

I think we can give facebook/threads the bad end of the bargin IF we have a data protections.

You know how powerful copy-left was for open source? I think we can do the same for Lemmy servers. We can have users agree (formally) that the data on a particular server cannot be used for training llvm's advertisements, marketing profiles, etc, and make it legally binding.

Even if we don't federate with them, Meta can still harvest the data so we should add these protections regardless. Maybe there is already something like this and I'm just unaware of it.

If we do add these protections and we ensure that the largest instance (e.g. Lemmy.world) is community controlled, I think it could work well for bringing more content to Lemmy.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's not fleeing as much as it is being so bored that that they never really find the motivation to come back.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah I completely disagree. Imagine if a city/local gov wanted to use Lemmy in order to be self hosted (similar to EU govs switching to Mastodon) but the public just wonders why their local gov put their stuff on a weird circle jerk website that's flooded with niche memes. "Why didn't they use the normal thing (i.e. reddit)?"

We should be welcoming enough that, when someone wants to make a new subreddit, they make Lemmy community instead. And I don't think thats the case right now.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Yeah the "All" in particular is pretty bad for the average person. They're not going to enjoy a Star Trek meme, followed by a Arch meme, a Self-hosted post, a grad-student Science meme, followed by a privacy post.

I'm also convinced Lemmy's "hot" algorithm is broken; I can easily find posts with ONE UPVOTE on the all feed. Hot is supposed to be a balance between acceleration and total vote count, but it seems like it just only acceleration. Go look at the front page of reddit. The difference is night and day.

We need a normie.world that has an "all" feed that doesn't contain 70% niche communities. We have c/humor, c/news, etc but they're completely diluted by overpowered niche posts.

view more: ‹ prev next ›