pro gamers disagree.
jerkface
joined 2 years ago
Sorry, where's the part where the means of production gets seized by labourers? What does THAT look like in Punxsutawney? What are we taking, from whom, how?
What would that look like in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania?
The grandfather of this device was called the Twiddler.
I could say exactly the same thing to you! You clearly understand the distinction I am making. But you have nothing to say about that, you just need to express your OCD. You're being noise. Do it to someone else.
TikTok isn't "Chinese social media." China has social media, and TikTok isn't it; TikTok is American social media that the Chinese control. It's an engineered product, and the function isn't showing you videos.
Both sides are correct. Or at least, half correct. They should both be banning both.
Okay, I fixed it. Now what?
Intended or not, it is.
Right? It's easy to bloviate about "free, ~~democratic~~ fair elections" when you're the world's superpower. When you live NEXT to the world's superpower, there's no such thing.
I think what you really mean is brains are not numeric. It's the "digit" part that is objectionable, not the "binary" part, which as an adjective for "digit" just means a way of encoding a portion of a number.
But in the end it's a semantic argument that really doesn't have a lot to do with the thesis.
Like If I link peer-reviewed articles on this stuff, you’d call me an incel & a misogynist
It might not be the articles' fault.
I am just getting into Beyond All Reason and I am absolutely taken by it