And if you're one of the people who can crack a beer open with the owners of Google, then you found your right community.
However, in the general case, I don't think these count as any individuals communities. You can't rub elbows with the people maintaining Google and Facebook. You can't talk to them about issues you're having, they're not going to dynamically modify the system for special cases that are important to your community. A community is a group of people who know each other.
Right. I think the real vision isn't that every single person self-hosts, but every community has somebody in it who does the self-hosting for the community. Everybody can be independent like villages instead of totally centralized like empires
I like the way you think! This is good engineering
I replaced both direct connect cables with new ones, I used new switch ports.
The asymmetry persists. Linux to windows 9.5GiB/s, Windows to Linux 6.5GiB/s
now we know it probably isn't the cables!
Yes, exactly the same results.
I'm thinking it might be on the linux side? i'm double checking my debian network stack now
That is a great idea to test!
iperf windows to debian -P4 6Gbit/sec
.\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.11.57 --get-server-output --dont-fragmen -P 4
Connecting to host 192.168.11.57, port 5201
[ 5] local 192.168.11.132 port 56910 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ 7] local 192.168.11.132 port 56911 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ 9] local 192.168.11.132 port 56912 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ 11] local 192.168.11.132 port 56913 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 192 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 192 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 764 MBytes 6.38 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 1.00-2.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 1.00-2.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 1.00-2.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.01 sec 760 MBytes 6.33 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.01-3.00 sec 186 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 2.01-3.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 2.01-3.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 2.01-3.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 2.01-3.00 sec 754 MBytes 6.38 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 3.00-4.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 3.00-4.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 3.00-4.01 sec 190 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.01 sec 761 MBytes 6.33 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.01-5.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 4.01-5.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 4.01-5.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 4.01-5.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 4.01-5.00 sec 754 MBytes 6.37 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 5.00-6.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 5.00-6.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 5.00-6.01 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.01 sec 762 MBytes 6.35 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.01-7.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 6.01-7.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 6.01-7.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 6.01-7.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 6.01-7.00 sec 754 MBytes 6.38 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.01 sec 192 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 7.00-8.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 7.00-8.01 sec 192 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 7.00-8.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.01 sec 766 MBytes 6.37 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.01-9.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 8.01-9.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 8.01-9.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 8.01-9.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 8.01-9.00 sec 752 MBytes 6.36 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 7] 9.00-10.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 9] 9.00-10.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 11] 9.00-10.01 sec 191 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.01 sec 764 MBytes 6.36 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[ 7] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.86 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec sender
[ 7] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[ 9] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.86 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec sender
[ 9] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[ 11] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec sender
[ 11] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 7.41 GBytes 6.36 Gbits/sec sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 7.41 GBytes 6.35 Gbits/sec receiver
Server output:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #15)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.11.132, port 56909
[ 5] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56910
[ 8] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56911
[ 10] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56912
[ 12] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56913
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.57 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 0.00-1.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 0.00-1.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 0.00-1.00 sec 187 MBytes 1.57 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 754 MBytes 6.32 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 1.00-2.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 1.00-2.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 1.00-2.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 754 MBytes 6.33 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 2.00-3.00 sec 191 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 2.00-3.00 sec 191 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 2.00-3.00 sec 191 MBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 760 MBytes 6.38 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 3.00-4.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 3.00-4.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 3.00-4.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 755 MBytes 6.34 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 4.00-5.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 4.00-5.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 4.00-5.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 759 MBytes 6.37 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 5.00-6.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 5.00-6.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 5.00-6.00 sec 188 MBytes 1.58 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 758 MBytes 6.35 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 6.00-7.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 6.00-7.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 6.00-7.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 759 MBytes 6.37 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 7.00-8.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 7.00-8.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 7.00-8.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 760 MBytes 6.38 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 8.00-9.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 8.00-9.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 8.00-9.00 sec 189 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 758 MBytes 6.35 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 9.00-10.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 9.00-10.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 9.00-10.00 sec 190 MBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 759 MBytes 6.37 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 2.50 MBytes 1.51 Gbits/sec
[ 8] 10.00-10.01 sec 2.50 MBytes 1.51 Gbits/sec
[ 10] 10.00-10.01 sec 2.50 MBytes 1.51 Gbits/sec
[ 12] 10.00-10.01 sec 2.50 MBytes 1.51 Gbits/sec
[SUM] 10.00-10.01 sec 10.0 MBytes 6.03 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[ 8] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[ 10] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[ 12] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.85 GBytes 1.59 Gbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 7.41 GBytes 6.35 Gbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
Though curiously i see the same behavior, 9.5Gbit linux->windows, and 5Gbit windows->linux... i'm perplexed
Yes. Almost exclusively using crypto.
I don't want reminders to donate again, I don't want to be targeted in future marketing campaigns, I don't want to receive political call to action emails as a ally.
I want to support and be done with it.
What about chicken tendies?
I run infrastructure that's mostly ubiquity, with a sprinkling of mikrotik. I have no complaints, I really like the devices. They just work.
A switch you need to manually configure after every reboot sounds quite annoying. I don't know if that's something you can fix in software, if not sounds like a deal breaker to me.
As far as security risks go: you really need to model your threats, and your level of risk tolerance. Every single device, everyone, regardless of who makes it, has security faults. There is a remote code exploit for every device out there, some of them haven't been discovered yet, some of them will never get discovered, but they all exist. So the real question is, how much work, how much money, do you want to spend to reduce the probability? And if it does get exploited what is your next fallback? Your network should have defense and depth. Breaking into one component should not breach everything.
Ubiquiti is great, because they've supported all of their devices, automatic updates. But they're a big force now, which means they're a big target. Which means there's more effort put into breaking into the systems. Not to mention they really really really really really really want to control everything via cloud accounts, so that's a huge risk surface that other network products don't have.
Going onto your risk tolerance, if you're trying to do all the best practices, internally in your network you would have some intrusion detection system, maybe a honey pot. Those would alert you. These systems exist because it's inevitable eventually your system will get breached, the question is how long before you notice?
Yes! All motherboards should come with SFP+ ports now!
Typically the attacks don't take 10 hours.... they take seconds, what takes time is getting the captured device a laboratory and the laboratory having time to look at it. So what will happen usually is the phone is put into a faraday bag, hooked up to a usb charger, and put on a shelf until the laboratory can get around to it.
Once the lab starts attacking the phone, it could take seconds as I said above, but some attacks are more involved requiring the phone to be disassembled and leads soldered onto the board. The restarting is about reducing the time the lab has before they can start and finish their attack
The same process applies to computers and laptops as well, there are lots of mouse jigglers for sale to prevent a screen saver from going on.
No, the photo is of a general computer. So most of the cooling is for the CPU and GPU.
SFP modules can get quite hot, especially if they're pushing high frequencies over copper. So you'll see some people complaining about their 10 gigabit copper SFP modules overheating. Especially on passively cooled network equipment.
Fiber optics don't get nearly as hot, and don't have overheating issues. Direct connect cables also do not get hot.
I'd much rather have all of my networking equipment with fiber optics, then copper. The trade-off is it's harder to splice your own fiber optic cable and put termination on it, the benefit is the equipment is much much cheaper, More reliable, cooler, goes further distance... A fiber optic SFP module cost about $10 for one, but a copper SFP module is like $100.