Your post was nonsense. "You can't have a boss that is strong against something else that used to work" is a stupid design "rule" you made up. Like every game that has meaningfully different builds is going to have parts that are easier or harder for a build.
jjjalljs
Yes, for example, famously pokemon with the elemental gyms was bad design. You should totally be able to use your fire pokemon to fight the fire gym. /s
And certainly no other game has something like a fire elemental boss that you can't use fire on.
There's just such a contingent of people who get off on hating from soft. It's tedious as heck
Except for some optional bosses I found it pretty chill. Most of the optional bosses that are hard have easier ways of dealing with them, too.
Using a tower shield and poke weapon was the easiest playthrough of the game I've done. Easiest of all the from soft games I've played, even. The final boss went down in 4 minutes and I barely had to heal.
I think a problem some people get with these games is they have a sort of tunnel vision. They'll have a scimitar and lose to the boss lose to the boss lose to the boss, and they don't really consider trying something else.
and a few of the worst offenders (Google is one that I know does this) add a random string of characters on the element that serve as a unique identifier that periodically changes and so requires me to readd them to my UBO blocklist.
Does ubo accept css selectors? Css has syntax for "match element that starts with, ends with, or contains, this string"
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Attribute_selectors
I like the game but I never finished it. I got pretty far when setting it to checkpoint mode, but lost interest near the end.
I don't really understand the game in detail so I don't know all the good builds. Extra legs and guns seemed strong.
Yeah I noticed that, too. Not sure why. Using apt on the command line is probably an alternative, at least.
Also switched to Linux (popos) this month. It's been fine. Games work. Browser works. No complaints, really.
She's a very selfish person who doesn't care about other people. She only cares about what benefits her. So when someone says "there's no material benefit to me" they sound like that kind of asshole.
Also it was a critically acclaimed show, not some obscure media.
That doesn’t logically follow. No more than saying “Building more highways is bad for the environment, ergo the highway administrators benefit from having more cars on the road.” You’re looking at a problem of induced demand and concluding the problem is on the demand-side of the equation.
What? Yes it does. Facebook needs users to generate revenue. With no users, they can't sell ads or user data. How else do you think they make money? Do you not think making money is a benefit for the owners of facebook?
It’s one node in a massive web. And it’s easy to say “Well, you have to do your part because ”. But mostly it’s just some random asshole on the internet telling me not to use my telephone because AT&T is run by a richer set of random assholes. There’s no material benefit to me and no collective coordinated action that I’m seriously participating in.
You're reminding me of Eleanor from the good place. Do you also litter? Refuse to return shopping carts?
I haven’t seen any real evidence to that effect.
Do you accept that facebook is harmful to the world, or would I need to try to prove that? There's the time they tried to see if they could make people sad by adjusting the feed. (They could)
If you accept that, it's a small step to "They benefit from having more users on their platform". More users means more engagement, which means more ads, and advertisers pay more money for those ads. No one's going to pay big bucks to advertise their stuff to an empty platform. Facebook's going to have a harder time selling user data and metadata if users aren't on there.
Now, getting one family to stop using facebook is a drop in the bucket. But every family that leaves makes it easier for the next family to leave.
"easy"
easy
EASY
Are you kidding me right now? Is this a bit?