No, you're trying to defend the profit's of others without realizing how they're taking advantage of your naivete.
Honestly, trying to explain things to useful idiots really is a fool's errand. The best I can do is make it clear as day for anyone with a brain how much of a sucker the average internet user is now.
Goodbye. I'm going to ignore you. I'm tired of arguing with tools.
Why would someone choose a more stressful job for the same pay?
Because they don't have a choice? Holy shit, you people are so disconnected from reality it's not even funny.
People work significantly harder than this CEO for significantly less. If the CEO was forced to make less money, he could still do the job without an issue. But why would he when useful idiots will defend him making more?
If he's not willing to do the job for less, then someone else would be willing to take over his role considering how many people already work way harder for way less.
Thanks for proving my last point right, again.
That's funny, because nothing about his job requires him to be there.
Unlike, you know, people outside of tech.
Uhh, no.
This is directly the point: Most people work more stressful jobs for considerably less. We should stop giving CEOs a pass.
Oh, and don't forget about this one!
but most people are useful idiots so here we are.
This person is just looking for an excuse to continuing censoring those he disagrees with.
He likes the abuse of power because it suits his agendas.
He doesn't know he's causing more harm than good, though. And I don't expect him to learn.
I agree.
Scumbags want censorship to only be used against those they disagree with.
This guy wasn't born yesterday.
It's clear matrix.org is being run by scumbags trying to take advantage of useful idiots.
The protocol itself seems good, though.
It's a load of bullshit and we shouldn't trust them.
$170k/year for 1 person is no joke.
This is just a grift to take advantage of morons.
Don't be one of them.
It must not be that stressful if you have $170k leftover to pay yourself.
Most people work more stressful jobs for considerably less. We should stop giving CEOs a pass.
This shouldn't need to be said, but most people are useful idiots so here we are.
Turn the argument on yourself.
Do you think we can't get a competent CEO for less than $170k/year? If so, why?
We can, considering how many people work harder for less. There's nothing particularly difficult or unique about this guys' position that justifies his salary. The only reason he's able to get it is because suckers like you are willing to pay for it.
I'm going to ignore you now. Tools are never going to learn from their mistakes or recognize how they're being played.
It's why things are the way they are.