knighthawk0811

joined 2 years ago
 

the government has claimed that law enforcement agencies do not need a warrant to sift through [previously collected data]. EFF argued for over a decade that this is unconstitutional, and now a federal court agrees with us.

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

they should be able to patch that as long as nothing relies on it working as is

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

ok, you are certainly not a common user.

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago

the error was that it didn't show the curated results they intended and instead showed nothing

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (11 children)

CF is DNS you could be using it a lot and never know

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago (5 children)

i think this would be true of basically any large service that had multiple data centers. whichever one catches your data is the one closest to you.

the difficulty is accessing that data even if you can't read it you still have the closest location.

sounds to me like the Internet working as intended. if you want true privacy you need to take extra steps