kurcatovium

joined 1 year ago
[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago

Max Payne was so amazing. I don't knwo why, but I totally loved the atmosphere. Night, cold, desperation, drug lords, bullet time, comic strips, music, fast gunplay, it all made such a wholesome package. (The only part I really disliked was the dream passage where you had tu run through darkness on thin red lines, that was PITA.)

I fear remake will lose some aspects that made Max Payne what it was. Replace comics with cut scenes and it would not be the same game. Replace dark, grim, shadowy graphics with modern flashy ray traced lightning awesomeness and it surely would look good, but it wouldn't be the Max. Replace fast paced shooting tempo with more cover based or just differently paced approach and yet again, it wouldn't be the same game. Etc.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's ugly AF and totally breaks the concept. At least that's what I think about it.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Does it really have plexi/glass side/top? Why on Earth?

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Well, it's first person shooter where shooting is pretty bad (unless you invest a lot of skill points in it). Melee is okayish, very simple, basically button mashing. Luckily combat is just a minor part of the game. Dialogues, story, atmosphere, all this very much compensates for the lack of good gunplay.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You sure you mean exiting? Or exciting?

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point I'd prefer a good book from HL universe explaining the lore, characters and stuff. Would buy 100%!

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's supposed to be extremely buggy as I've heard. Can't comment much more on that, except fpr this snippet. Maybe it's fixed now, maybe even for long time, but I wouldn't trust it just like that after what I've heard.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Best of luck with encryption on there. Everyone I know tell me NOT to use nextclouds encryption.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Classic Ubisoft...

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bitwarden client is FOSS same as Keepass, though. Why aren't you afraid of Keepass having backdoor by "insert whatever big corporation sponsoring FOSS" giving said companies free access to your passwords you happily store in their clouds?

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Dude, how is bitwarden hosting your own, locally encrypted (in FOSS client) password database any different than using keypass and syncing it however you want?

I don't even use Bitwarden myself, I'm using keepass too, but this attitude is ... weird?

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Trusting one FOSS client good. Trusting different FOSS client bad. Logic where?

 

Hello, not sure how on-topic is this, but I'll ask anyway. Since I'm wrapping my head around this topic for long time to no avail.

I'm planning to buy NAS mostly to store my music, pictures and documents on my place. At the beginning I'd like to keep it simple so I don't plan to install billion things on it. I would definitely want to install adblocker like PiHole/AdGuard. I'm also eye-ing Tailscale for remote access (no public IP) and Jellyfin/Emby for music streaming at home. So apart from usual NFS/SMB file shares, let's say there are these three apps I'd like it to run at the beginning.

The NAS has to be as quiet as possible, so even thought it's more expensive, I'll have to go with SSD drives. Looking at prices two 2 TB (in mirror RAID) should be doable and should be enough space for me, at least for now. I'm no hoarder.

I have few other "must-haves":

  1. decently working companion app that automatically backups pictures from at least 2 android phones (my wife needs to deal with it and she's not really friends with tech stuff)
  2. possibility to upgrade storage other than just replacing drives for bigger ones
  3. simple, easy to use (both setup and "rescue") scheduled backups to external USB drive
  4. I knew I had something else but it completely slipped out of my head

That brings me to what's available. I almost pulled the trigger on Synology DS423+. It looks reasonable powerful, I can put 4 SATA SSDs and 2 M.2... that's what I thought. But it turned out it's not possible to use M.2 as storage with anything but Synology's own overpriced drives that aren't even available in my country. So, it's just four SATA drives, which is... "not great, not terrible" as some would say. What seems to be a big plus is the DSM. Everyone I know really praises it. Plus it seems to have very good reputation in terms of longevity of devices.

Then there is QNAP. Apparently their system QTS is not as polished as DSM, but everything needed should still be there. There's similarly priced, similarly equipped TS-462. It's just dual-core CPU, but has more RAM (not upgradeable though) and it seems it can accept M.2 as storage at least. As per internet research, the build quality is just as good as Synology.

And then there's Asustor, which I heard about years ago and then completely forgot they exist. Last week my friend mentioned this name, so I checked their offering too. Well, Nimbustor AS5402T looks absolutely the best on paper! Well, it only has two regular drives, because it's got FOUR M.2 slots! I assume it's because SATA is on decline, but M.2 SSDs are cheaper than SATA nowadays so it's actually better for me to have the numbers reversed. And it's cheapest on top of it. So where's the catch? I presume the ADM system is piece of shit. Right? Or is it build quality that's bad? Reliability? IDK.

Which of these three do you think would be the best for my needs? I'm more than open to other offerings and suggestions too! Thank you very much!

 

Browsing the web I came across this (meta) search engine. From the first glance, it seems promising and giving quite a good results to my searches. Definitely better than Google, Bing or DDG, which tend to be full of SEO/ads/AI bullshit these days. Does anyone use it?

It somehow implies it's open source and indeed there is github https://github.com/PresearchOfficial too, but I can't find any link from the presearch.com itself to it. It's just... IDK, weird?

view more: next ›