I still think the games biggest failure was it being paid (and not cheap) while there is plenty of F2P competitors that aren't any worse. Why on Earth would anyone pay for mediocre online shooter just to try it out when you can instantly play dozen similar ones for free?
kurcatovium
joined 1 year ago
As a shareholder I would be pretty hard against this kind of shit that do nothing positive but hurts PC sales.
No wonder. Why should I need some shitty sony account on PC? I never asked for it, nobody ever asked for it.
When you don't want to do, you can watch someone else do on twitch... I'm not even GenZ and I kind of do the same thing sometimes.
Yeah 80s/90s were the sweet spot for action movies. Most of them were naive and predictable, but also incredibly easy to digest. I'd say it was kind of WYSIWYG in movie space: good guys were good, bud guys were bad, plot was easy so your dog can comprehend it, no complicated backstory, no bullshit, just action and enjoyable fun.
What's wrong with it?
It's pretty good for what it is. I finished it once years ago. Tried it again last year, got almost to the end and somehow lost interest. Still have it on my drive, so I might actually finish it.
Except for power consumption and heat generation ;-) This is where Bulldozers were hot shit!
Sony went the apple way. Next stand will be brushed aluminium for mere $999...
I started old gem Arx Fatalis. I tried to chew through it during last two decades, but I always failed. Not because of the game itself, because it is indeed very cool. This time I believe I will emerge victorious!
Unless you're European. Then driving manual is considered basic life skill like riding a bike.
Idk, my point still stands. Ofc I could try it during open beta (if I knew), but then it still cost $40 which is ridiculous, because all the microtransactions were still there (if I'm not mistaken) so it felt like f2p, played like it, but stil cost 40 bucks. Lol, nope.